Sri. Devaraju S v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
KIADB General Award quashing writ petition (LA-KIADB); 3 acres Sy.No.97 Doddagollahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural; enhanced compensation Section 29(2) Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act 1966; developed land in lieu of compensation per GO dated 23.02.2021; issue covered by co-ordinate bench judgment Sri Salagirigowda v. State of Karnataka W.P.No.21379/2022 (31.01.2023), citing Smt. Rukmini W.P.No.3961139612/2016; petition disposed on same terms, contentions kept open; Justice M. Nagaprasanna, HC Karnataka, 01.07.2025.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed on the same terms as the co-ordinate bench judgment in Sri Salagirigowda v. State of Karnataka (W.P.No.21379/2022, disposed 31.01.2023): petitioner permitted to file a representation seeking enhanced benefit under Section 29(2) of the KIADB Act, KIADB to consider the same in accordance with law within three months, and liberty to lay claim for the developed portion of the land in terms of the Government Notification dated 23.02.2021 in lieu of compensation; all contentions kept open; no costs. The General Award itself was not quashed by this order.