Ningaiah U Doddon v. Sandeep C
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC Bengaluru; Lalitha Kanneganti J.; WP No. 15614 of 2020 (GM-FC); decision 03-06-2025; neutral citation NC: 2025:KHC:18608. Petitioners Ningaiah U Doddon, Bhagyamma and minor Rithiksha v. Respondents Sandeepa C (represented by Ganesha R) and Mahendra H.N (served, unrepresented). Writ under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India, sought dismissal of petition in G and WC No.16/2019 before Principal District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga (Annx-A). Memo recorded that the underlying petition was transferred and nothing survived; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending IAs closed. No precedent discussed; no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Taking the petitioners' memo on record, the Court held that nothing survived for consideration in the writ petition and dismissed it as having become infructuous.