Disposed¶38

Sri Pradeep H R v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC6 Mar 2025WP/13763/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Office objection; three weeks' time; automatic dismissal clause; conditional listing on 09.04.2025; writ of mandamus under Article 226; demolition of allegedly illegal building; notice No.HU.GRA.PAM.30/2020-21 dated 29-06-2020; Hulimangala Grama Panchayath; BMRDA; BESCOM Chandapura Division and Jigani Sub Division; Anekal Taluk; Bengaluru Urban District; public interest litigation (LB-RES-PIL); Karnataka High Court; Chief Justice N.V. Anjaria; Justice M.I. Arun.

What did the court decide?

Three weeks' time to remove the office objection; upon compliance the petition to be listed on 09.04.2025; failing compliance, automatic dismissal without further reference to the Court. ¶38

Sri Pradeep H R Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 06^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.N.V.ANJARIA CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.13763/2021(LB-RES-PIL)

¶8

BETWEEN

¶9

1 . SRI PRADEEP H R

¶10

S/O RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT 177, SAPTHAGIRI NILAYA 3RD CROSS, CINAYAKA LAYOUT, MADAPATTANA HARAGADDE POST, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560076.

¶11

2 . SRI.J.SIDDARAJU

¶12

S/O JAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, STATE ORGANISING SECRETARY, KARNATAKA DALITHA SANGARSHA SAMITHI OFFICE CUM RESIDENCE AT NO.29, RAJA GRUHA, MANTAPA VILLAGE, BANNERUGHATTA POST, JIGINI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-560 083.

¶13

…PETITIONER/S

¶14

(BY SRI./SMT.: VENKATESH H N, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND

¶16

1 . THE COMMISSIONER BMRDA NO.1, ALI ASKAR ROAD, BENGALURU-560052.

¶17

W.P.NO.13763/2021

¶18

¶19

2 . THE MEMBER SECRETARY AND JOINT DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE AT NO.430. ANNA BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, HENNAGARA GATE, HOSURU MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU -560099.

¶20

3 . THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BENGALURU NAGARA ZILLA PANCHAYAT BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT KARIYAPPA ROAD, BANASHANKARI BENGALURU-560050.

¶21

4 . THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 105.

¶22

5 . THE PUBLIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICER HULIMANGALA GRAMA PANCHAYATH ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU-560 105.

¶23

6 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (V) BESCOM CHANDAPURA DIVISION, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU-560099.

¶24

7 . THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, JIGANI SUB DIVISION, JIGANI ANEKAL, BENGALURU-560 105.

¶25

8 . G.MURALI KUMAR S/O G.NARASIMHALU AGED 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, 9TH CROSS, YELACHENAHALLI, 1ST FLOOR, KASINAGAR, BENGALURUF-560078.

¶26

W.P.NO.13763/2021

¶27

¶28

9 . SMT.SHANTHI.R W/O G.MURALI KUMAR AGED 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.2, 9TH CROSS, YELACHENAHALLI, 1ST FLOOR, KASINAGAR, BENGALURUF-560078.

¶29

…RESPONDENT/S

¶30

(BY SRI./SMT.:YOGESH D.NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 (VK FILED) V.VISWANATH SETTY ADV. FOR R-8 & R-9 (NOC VK) H .SHANTHI BHUSHAN ADV. FOR R-7, (VK FILED))

¶31

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I). TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 7 TO TAKE ACTION AND DEMOLISH THE ILLEGAL BUILDING OF RESPONDENT NO.8 & 9 PURSUANT TO NOTICE ISSUED VIDE ANNEXURE-D, DATED.29-06-2020, BEARING NO.HU.GRA.PAM.30/2020-21, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 5 AS PER LAW AND ETC.,

¶32

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER.

¶33

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA AND HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN

W.P.NO.13763/2021

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA)

¶38

Three weeks' time is granted to remove the office objection failing which, the petition shall stand dismissed automatically without reference to or order of the Court.

¶39

In the event the office objection is complied with, the petition shall be listed on 09.04.2025

¶40

Sd/(N.V.ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶41

Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE

¶42

TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : SG COMPARED BY : SG

¶43

COPY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Sri Pradeep H R v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Pradeep H R v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Prasanna Kumar a v Vs Smt Deepa M Cholan

Sri Y S Ravi Kumar Vs Smt Shubha Kalyan

Baikadi Krishika Sangha Vs Haradi Gram Panchayath

Dr Sanjay Kumar Varshney Vs Prof. B.L.V. Prasad

Mr.Charanjeet Chandan Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Girish Bhardwaj Vs State of Karnataka