Dismissed¶40

Sri. Mohammed Umar Khan, v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Sept 2025WP/13504/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petition (GM-KLA) dismissed for non-prosecution on 01-09-2025; petitioner Mohammed Umar Khan, ex-revenue inspector, Tumkur; certiorari sought under Articles 226/227 against orders dated 11-6-2015, 17-6-2015 (Lokayukta) and 30-3-2023; no representation in first or revised call; pending applications dismissed; no merits decision, no holdings.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri. Mohammed Umar Khan, Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34486-DB WP No. 13504 of 2023

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T WRIT PETITION NO.13504 OF 2023 (GM-KLA)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI MOHAMMED UMAR KHAN AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS S/O. LATE PEER KHAN EX-REVENUE INSPECTOR, 8TH WARD CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL TUMKUR DISTRICT RESIDING AT 12TH CROSS BOMBAY BUILDING MAIN ROAD, P.H. COLONY TUMKUR-572 101.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI SADAKATH U., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.

¶16

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (A AND E) GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA

¶17

BENGALURU-560 001.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:34486-DB WP No. 13504 of 2023

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (MUNICIPALITIES AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES) ROOM NO.435, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.

¶22

THE UNDER SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION-2 AND BOARD URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001.

¶23

THE LOKAYUKTA STATE OF KARNATAKA MULTI-STORIED BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.

¶24

THE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ENQUIRIES-4, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.

¶25

THE MUNICIPAL DIRECTORATE (ADMN) GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION-2 AND BOARD URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.

¶26

THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TUMKUR (NOW TUMKUR CITY CORPORATION) TOWNHALL, BHAGAWAN MAHAVEER ROAD GANDHINAGAR, TUMKUR-572 102 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SMT. PRATHIBHA R.K., A.G.A., FOR R-1 TO R-4 AND R-7;

¶29

SRI ASHWIN S. HALADY, ADVOCATE, FOR R-5 AND R-6, &

¶30

SRI VINAYAKA B. AND SRI SUBRAMANYA R., ADVOCATES, FOR R-8)

¶31

¶32

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:34486-DB WP No. 13504 of 2023

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER, DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING (i) ORDER DATED 30-3-2023 PASSED IN ANNEXURE-A BY RESPONDENT NO.4; (ii) ORDER DATED 17-6-2015 PASSED IN ANNEXURE-C BY RESPONDENT NO.5, AND (iii) ORDER DATED 11-6-2015 PASSED IN ANNEXURE-D BY RESPONDENT NO.6, AND ETC.

¶35

THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶36

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶37

ORAL ORDER

¶38

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH)

¶39

The case is taken in the revised call. There is no

¶40

representation on behalf of the petitioner in the first call as well as in revised call. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶41

In view of the dismissal of the main petition, pending applications, if any, stand dismissed.

¶42

Sd/(D K SINGH) JUDGE

¶43

Sd/(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE

¶44

KVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

Sri. Mohammed Umar Khan, v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri. Mohammed Umar Khan, v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sharavathi Vs Saleelkumar Padya

Sri Benakesha R Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Sujit Kumar Shety Vs Sri Seetharam Ganiga

T M a E Societys Vs State of Karnataka

Naveen Kumar Vs Ksrtc and Nwkrtc

Sri Shivakumaraiah H N Vs the State of Karnataka