Smt.Bhadramma Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

Smt.Bhadramma Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petitioners' grievance to be considered and appropriate orders passed in terms of the decision in Shivanna Vs. Deputy Commissioner (W.P.No.19639/2021 dated 05.09.2022); writ petition disposed of accordingly on the statements of both sides.

Issue for consideration

Whether the third respondent-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, should be directed to consider the petitioners' representation dated 18.10.2008 (Annexure-D), pass appropriate orders for cancellation of forfeiture (Phada) and enter the petitioners' names in the revenue records in respect of land bearing Sy.No.77/10 measuring 20 guntas situated at Ajjanahalli Village, Tavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk.

Court's answer

In view of the statement of the learned Additional Government Advocate that, in terms of the decision of this Court in Shivanna Vs. Deputy Commissioner (W.P.No.19639/2021 dated 05.09.2022), the petitioners' grievance will be considered and appropriate orders passed, and learned counsel for the petitioners submitting that the petitioners will be satisfied if such action is taken, the matter stands disposed of accordingly.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Lok Adalat conciliation order (High Court Legal Services Committee, Bengaluru) in a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioners sought a direction to the third respondent-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, to consider their representation dated 18.10.2008 (Annexure-D) and pass appropriate orders for cancellation of forfeiture (Phada/PADA) and enter their names in the revenue records in respect of land bearing Sy.No.77/10 measuring 20 guntas situated at Ajjanahalli Village, Tavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. The learned Additional Government Advocate submitted that, in terms of the decision of this Court in Shivanna Vs. Deputy Commissioner, W.P.No.19639/2021 dated 05.09.2022, the petitioners' grievance would be considered and appropriate orders passed. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the petitioners would be satisfied if such action were taken. Coram: Justice R Devdas and Mrs. Jayashree Krishnamurthy, Member (Conciliators). By order dated 11.09.2025 the matter stood disposed of accordingly.

1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

&

MRS.JAYASHREE KRISHNAMURTHY, MEMBER

W.P. No.12812/2025

(Lok Adalat No.6853/2025)

BETWEEN:

SMT. BHADRAMMA W/O. LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

SRI RUDRESH

S/O. LATE BASAPPA

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

SRI MANOHAR

S/O. LATE BASAPPA

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

ALL ARE R/A UNNIGERE VILLAGE

THAVAREKERE HOBLI,

BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK

BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562 130.

...PETITIONERS

(BY SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P. H., ADVOCATE)

2

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M. S. BUILDING, DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 009.

THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 009.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES MORE PARTICULARLY THE 3^RD RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.10.2008 VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS FOR CANCELLATION OF FORFEITURE (PHADA) AND ENTER THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.77/10 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 20 GUNTAS SITUATED AT AJJANAHALLI VILLAGE, TAVAREKERE HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK EXPEDITIOUSLY.

THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED:

3

CONCILIATION ORDER

The prayer in this writ petition is to issue a direction to the third respondent-Tahsildar, Bangalore South Taluk, to consider the representation dated 18.10.2008 at Annexure ‘D’ and pass appropriate orders for cancellation of forfeiture (PADA) and enter the names of the petitioners in the revenue records in respect of land bearing Sy.No.77/10 measuring 20 guntas situated at Ajjanahalli Village, Tavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk.

Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that in terms of the decision of this Court in the case of Shivanna Vs. Deputy Commissioner in W.P.No.19639/2021 dated 05.09.2022, the grievance

of the petitioners will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed.

In view of the statement made by the learned Additional Government Advocate and learned Counsel

4

for the petitioners submitting that the petitioners will

be satisfied if such action is taken, the matter stands disposed of accordingly.

MEMBER

JT/CT:VC