Ramesha K S v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2025WP/10091/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; mandamus sought against respondents 4 to 6 to consider representations dated 05-10-2024 and 08-11-2024 (Annexures A and B) relating to No Confidence Motion in Vyjakuru Silk Producers and Former Cooperative Society Ltd, Chintamani Taluk, Chikkaballapura; State Co-operative Election Authority; Department of Co-operation, Government of Karnataka; Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; no adjudication on merits; no case law relied upon.

What did the court decide?

None; petition disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ¶¶49

Ramesha K S Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:19141 WP No. 10091 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.10091 OF 2025 (CS-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

RAMESHA K S SON OF SONNAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT SANTEKALLAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶11

THIPPAREDDY H N SON OF DODDANARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT JODIHOSAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶12

Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

MANJUNATHA A.S SON OF SHRIRAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT AKKIMANGALA, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶14

MANJUNATHA S.M, SON OF MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT SUBBARAYANAPETE, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶15

PILLAMMA WIFE OF NARAYANAREDDY

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:19141 WP No. 10091 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT KONGANAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128. SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED

¶19

VINOD KUMAR S SON OF SHIVARUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT VYJAKURU, CHINTAMANI TALUK,

¶20

CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶21

KARAGAPPA REDDY V SON OF VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶22

MARAPPA SON OF BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT HOSAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT - 563128.

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SRI.AKKI MANJUNATH GOWDA K, ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶27

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3^RD FLOOR, SHANTHINAGARA, TTMC, A BLOCK, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 027.

¶28

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:19141 WP No. 10091 of 2025

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNION LTD CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT, SHIDLAGHATTA ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA – 562 101.

¶31

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNION LTD CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, APMC YARD, M G ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA – 562 101.

¶32

SMT. BHAVYA J R RETURNING OFFICER VYJAKURU SILK PRODUCERS AND FORMER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD VYJAKURU, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT – 563 128.

¶33

VYJAKURU SILK PRODUCERS AND FORMER COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD VYJAKURU, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT- 563128 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶34

…RESPONDENTS

¶35

(BY SRI. YOGESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R5)

¶36

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION R-4 AND 6 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD. 05.10.2024 AND 08.11.2024 MADE BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX-A AND B. INCLUDING AWARD OF THE COSTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ETC.,

¶37

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶38

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC:19141 WP No. 10091 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶42

ORAL ORDER

¶43

The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the

¶44

following reliefs:

¶45

“a) Issue a writ of mandamus direction Fourth to Sixth Respondents to consider the representation dated 05-10-2024 & 08-11-2024 made by the petitioner as per Annexure-‘A & B’ , in the interest of justice and equity.

¶46

b) Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper and in the facts and circumstances of the case, including award of the costs of the proceedings to meet the ends of justice.”

¶47

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the above petition has been rendered infructuous as the meeting to consider ‘No Confidence Motion’ has already been held.

¶48

Placing his submission on record, the petition stands

¶49

disposed of .

¶50

SD/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶51

¶52

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8

Ramesha K S v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesha K S v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D R Gangaraju Vs Ramaiah Since Deceased by Hir Lrs

Sharanappa @ Sharanagouda Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Dayananda Thokkottu Vs the Recovery Officer

Smt C Padmavathi Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Shivaprasad Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr. Yashavantha Shetty Vs the State of Kanrataka