Dismissed¶37

Laxmi Nilesh Pawar v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Sept 2025WP/100707/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Dharwad; WP No. 100707 of 2025 (S-RES); dismissed as withdrawn/infructuous on memo dated 12.09.2025; petitioner Laxmi Nilesh Pawar, Assistant Lineman HESCOM, Khanapur; representation dated 25/10/2024, Annexure-J; verification report of marks card; mandamus; Respondent Authority No.2 Commissioner Department of Employment and Training, Bangalore; State of Council for Vocational Training in Karnataka; KPTCL Hubballi; HESCOM Belagavi Executive Engineer / Assistant Executive Engineer / Section Officer Balekundri; Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; Justice Suraj Govindaraj; pending interlocutory applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Accepting the memo dated 12.09.2025 and the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. ¶37

Laxmi Nilesh Pawar Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:11883 WP No. 100707 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 100707 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

LAXMI NILESH PAWAR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: ASSISTANT LINEMEN IN HESCOM, PRESENTLY WORKING IN KHANAPUR, R/O: KOLUR TANDA, TQ: MUDDEBHIHAL, DISTRICT: VIJAYAPUR – 586 129.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. PRASHANT V. MOGALI, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, STATE OF COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONAL TRAINING IN KARNATAKA, BANGALORE – 560 001.

¶13

Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING KOUSHALYA BHAVAN, DIARY CIRCLE, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALOE 560 076.

¶15

THE KARNTAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI – 580 020.

¶16

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), O AND M, RURAL DIVISION HESCOM LIMITED, GANDHI NAGAR, BELAGAVI – 590 016.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC-D:11883 WP No. 100707 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), O AND M RURAL DIVISION NO.2 HESCOM LIMITED, GANDHI NAGAR, BELAGAVI - 590 016.

¶21

THE SECTION OFFICER, O AND M, BALEKUNDRI SECTION, HESCOM LTD, BALKUNDRI, TQ: DIST: BELAGAVI – 591 103.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 TO R5)

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 25/10/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND ISSUE THE VERIFICATION REPORT OF MARKS CARD OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC.,

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

¶28

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

¶29

a. Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authority No.2 to consider the Representation of the Petitioner dated 25/10/2024 vide Annexure-J and issue the verification report of marks card of the Petitioner.

¶30

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:11883 WP No. 100707 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

b. And grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.

¶33

A memo dated 12.09.2025 singed by learned counsel

¶34

appearing for the petitioner, has been filed, which reads as under;

¶35

“The Advocate for petitioner submits as under;

¶36

The above-mentioned writ petition rendered in to infructuous therefore the same may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶37

Accepting the said memo and submission of the counsel for the petitioner, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶38

In view of disposal of the writ petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly.

¶39

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶40

AM/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73

Laxmi Nilesh Pawar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Laxmi Nilesh Pawar v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh S/O Ganapati Naik Vs Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Umesh S/O Ganapati Naik Vs Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Shri. Mallappa S/O Fakkirappa Hosalli Vs the State of Karnataka

Naganagouda S/O Shivanagouda Niralagi Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Shri Pramod S/O Ananda Karadage Vs the Karnataka State Law University

Arun S/O Shankarappa Somagond Vs the Thasildar