Sri Nagaraju L v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2025WP/10042/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; WRIT PETITION NO. 10042 OF 2025 (KLR-RES); Justice E.S. Indiresh; decided 05.06.2025; petitioner Sri Nagaraju L v. State of Karnataka (Dept. of Revenue) and Tahsildar, Magadi Taluk; subject: mutation of revenue records per registered partition deed dt. 09.08.2002 and representation dt. 07.01.2025 (Annex-H); result: petition disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider representation within 3 months in accordance with law; no opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 (Tahsildar, Magadi Taluk) to consider the representation dated 07.01.2025 at Annexure-H within three months from receipt of certified copy of the order, in accordance with law; no opinion expressed on merits. ¶¶31

Sri Nagaraju L Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:19055 WP No. 10042 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 10042 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. NAGARAJU L, S/O LATE LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/OF VEERASAGARA VILLAGE, KUDURU HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK - 562 120, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. VENKATESH C.R, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶14

THE TAHSILDAR, MAGADI TALUK, MAGADI - 562 120 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:19055 WP No. 10042 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT TO R-2 AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THE REVENUE RECORDS OR TO MUTATE THE REVENUE RECORDS AS PER THE REGISTERED PARTITION DEED DATED 09.08.2002, IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER, AS FOR ANNEX-A IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS BEARING SY NO. 1/2, NO. 2/1, NO. 38/1, NO. 40/3, NO. 36/1, NO. 37/1, NO. 25/1 AND NO. 1/3 ALL THE PROPERTIES ARE SITUATED AT VEERASAGARA VILLAGE AND ANOTHER VILLAGE, HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, KUDURU HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, AS PER THE AC ORDER DTD 09.11.2023 AS FOR ANNEX-G AND ALSO AS PER THE REPRESENTATION AT ANNX-H DATED 04.01.2025.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶24

In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for direction to respondent No.2 to enter his name in the mutation entries pursuant to the registered partition deed dated 09.08.2002. In this regard, the petitioner has approached

¶25

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:19055 WP No. 10042 of 2025

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

respondent No.2 by way of representation dated 07.01.2025 produced at Annexure-H.

¶29

In that view of the matter, without expressing any

¶30

opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is hereby directed to consider the representation dated 07.01.2025 produced at Annexure-H, within outer limit of three months from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶31

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶32

Sd/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶33

PHM

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46 CT: BHK

Sri Nagaraju L v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Nagaraju L v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Ramakka Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Venkatesh Murthy R Vs the Secretary

Sri Jitesh B P Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Parvathamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Kamalamma Vs State of Karnataka

The Karnataka Badigedarara Vs the State of Karnataka