The Secretary to Government v. Laxmibai W/O Late Chandappa

Karnataka HC30 Oct 2025WA/200098/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Illegible/corrupt judgment text; issuing institution indicated as HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (digital signature location field, para 16); signatory named VARSHA N RASALKAR (not established as a member of the bench). No case number, parties, dates, issues, holdings, treatments, or quantum recoverable. Recommend re-ingestion from an uncorrupted copy.

What the court decided

AI extract

The Secretary to Government Vs Laxmibai W/O Late Chandappa — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

��

��

��

��

��!��"�^�� #��

$��!��

��%� ��&��'�!��$��!��

¶9

��

¶10

��%� ��&��'�!��#��'��(� #�

¶11

��$$�� ) ��!*

¶12

��

¶13

��

¶14

��

¶15

��

¶16

Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

��

¶18

�� !��"��

¶19

��

¶20

��^��

¶21

��

¶22

#��

¶23

��

¶24

�� $��

��

��

��

%��

!��"�

��

��&��'$�� (�� $�� )��

¶33

%��

¶34

!��"�

¶35

��'��#�� "��'�� *��'�� +�$�� ,��-��

�� *��'��(�

��( ��.��*��

��.������

��

��

�� '��&��

!��(��.��*��"

� /012�34/�5033/1�67�5/1839��

¶45

�� 489�:183�0;;/0<�89�=8</2�>?�34/��303/�@72/1�

¶46

�/A3867�#�6=��017030B0��8C4��6@13��A3�A40<</7C87C�34/� 612/1�203/2��,��-�;099/2�87�'��6�� +��6=�� 281/A387C� 34/� 0;;/<<0739� 36� 8783803/� 34/� 0AD@8983867� ;16A//287C9�87�1/9;/A3�6=��?��6�+�$��/:��?��6��+� 5/09@187C�#�0A1/9�983@03/2�03��0C07040<<8�E8<<0C/��6><8� �@<>01C0�� D� 072� �893�� @<>01C0� 072� ;0?� 34/� A65;/7903867��

¶47

� �3� 89� 763� 87� 289;@3/� 3403� 34/�

¶48

1/9;672/73$;/383867/1�89�34/�6:7/1�6=�34/�<072�>/0187C� �?��6�+�$��6=��0C07040<<8�E8<<0C/��5/09@187C�#�0A1/9�� 6><8��@<>01C0��D�072��893��@<>01C0��

¶49

#� �3�89�0<96�763�87�289;@3/�3403�34/�9082�<072�409� >//7�@38<8F/2�=61�A67931@A3867�6=�34/��6<8A/��108787C��/73/1��

��

��

�87A/�:8346@3�0AD@8983867��34/�;/383867/1.9�<072�409�>//7� @38<8F/2�=61�34/�9082�A67931@A3867��4/1/=61/��34/�;/383867/1� 409�0;;160A4/2�34/��017030B0��303/��@507��8C439� �655899867�>?�839�612/1�203/2��+�� -�87�� 6��-�-$��A677/A3/2�:834��6�#--$��-��34/�

¶54

�655899867�281/A3/2�34/�0@3461838/9�36�8783803/�34/� 0AD@8983867� ;16A//287C9� 072� 36� ;0?� 0;;16;1803/� A65;/7903867��7�9;83/�6=�3403��34/�0;;/<<0739$�303/�40E/� =08</2�36�;0?�07?�A65;/7903867�36�34/�;/383867/1�� 4/1/0=3/1�� 34/� 0;;/<<0739$�303/� :8346@3� 878380387C� 0AD@8983867�;16A//287C9��6==/1/2�0�9@5�6=��9�,��$��36� 34/�;/383867/1�09�A65;/7903867��34/�905/�409�>//7� 1/=@9/2�>?�34/�;/383867/1��87A/�76�7638=8A03867�=61� 0AD@8983867�6=�34/�<072�402�>//7�899@/2�072�76�<0:=@<� A65;/7903867� 402� >//7� ;082�� 34/� ;/383867/1� 409� 0;;160A4/2�3489��6@13�>?�=8<87C�0�:183�;/383867��4/�</017/2� �87C</�*@2C/�>?�612/1�203/2��,��-��281/A3/2�34/� 0;;/<<0739��:46�0AD@81/2�34/�<072�6=�34/�;/383867/1�072�36� ;0?�34/�A65;/7903867�:8346@3�0AD@8983867�6=�34/�<072�6=�

��

��

34/�;/383867/1��34/��303/�409�=8</2�3489�0;;/0<�:834�2/<0?�6=�

¶59

��#�20?9�67<?�67�34/�C16@72�1089/2�87�3489�0;;/0<�5/56�89�

¶60

3403� 34/?� 40E/� ;082� �9�,��$�� 36� 34/� 1/9;672/73$;/383867/1�36�3403�/==/A3��34/?�40E/�763� ;162@A/2�07?�26A@5/739�/E/7�>/=61/�34/�</017/2��87C</� *@2C/��9858<01�A673/73867�409�>//7�30B/7�3403�409�>//7� 7/C038E/��9�67�3620?��763�0�987C</�1@;//�409�>//7�;082�36� 34/�;/383867/1�072�76�C16@72�409�>//7�502/�6@3�87�3489� 0;;/0<��/7A/��34/�0;;/0<�2/9/1E/9�36�>/�2895899/2��

¶61

�� AA61287C<?��34/�'183��;;/0<�89��

¶62

!+,�� )��$��!��*� '��

¶63

!+,�� )�#��'��(� #*� '��

¶64

��

¶65

�893��6�(��<��6�(��

¶66

��(��

The Secretary to Government v. Laxmibai W/O Late Chandappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

The Secretary to Government v. Laxmibai W/O Late Chandappa

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Manager Vs Rajashree and Ors.

Sapna Vs Dr. Santosh

Iranagouda S/O Shivanagouda Patil Vs Shri Pradeep P. IAS

The United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Babu and Ors.

Rajesh S/O Somalingappa Vs the State of Karnataka and Ors.

Laxmibai and Ors. Vs Mohd Abdul Khadeer and Anr.