Sapna v. Dr. Santosh
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court judgment with severely corrupted text; miscellaneous first appeal resolved by compromise: joint compromise petition and amicable settlement between the parties recorded; Court held the appeal does not survive for consideration and pending applications do not survive; disposition verb, dates, case number, forum details, party names and citations illegible.
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded that the parties have amicably settled their dispute in terms of a settlement dated [date illegible in the corrupted source] (recovered by decoding). ¶¶32
What the court decided
- 1 -
���������������������� ����������������������
��������
����������������������������������
�����������������
������������������� ����������������������
��������
��������������������������������������������
������
�����������������������������������������������
����������������������������� ���������!��"#
���������
������$%���������������������� ���&��������������&������������ �%��������������������������� ���������������������������
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether, in view of the joint compromise petition and the settlement recorded between the parties, the miscellaneous first appeal survives for consideration (reconstructed from corrupted text).medium confidence¶¶32
The court heldThe Court recorded that the parties have amicably settled their dispute in terms of a settlement dated [date illegible in the corrupted source] (recovered by decoding).ratio¶¶32
Procedural history
How this case reached the court
- Prior proceeding
Recovered from corrupted text: learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memorandum (opening words of the paragraph; the balance is illegible).¶¶31
- Prior proceeding
Recovered from corrupted text: the memorandum encloses a joint compromise petition dated [date illegible]; a compromise petition was stated to have been filed before the 'Principal Civil Judge', the remainder of the forum identification and the case number being illegible.¶¶32
- Prior proceeding
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/200937/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court