Dismissed¶36

Sri H T Ramesh v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC3 Sept 2025WA/115/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ appeal dismissed as withdrawn on appellant's memo; Karnataka High Court Act Section 4; WA No. 115 of 2022 (LB-RES); NC: 2025:KHC:34418-DB; challenge to dismissal of WP No.25585/2019 (GM-MISC) dated 17.11.2021; appellant H.T. Ramesh; respondents include State of Karnataka, Beluru-Halebeedu Planning Authority, Assistant Commissioner Sakaleshapura, CEO Municipality Belur; Belur/Hassan district; counsel: Naik N.R. (appellant), S.H.Raghavendra AGA (R1, R2, R4), Ravishankar A. (R3), A.Nagarajappa (R5); bench Jayant Banerji and Umesh M Adiga; decision date 03.09.2025; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo for withdrawal, which was also signed by the appellant; consequently the writ appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. ¶36

Sri H T Ramesh Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34418-DB WA No. 115 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA WRIT APPEAL NO. 115 OF 2022 (LB-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI.H.T.RAMESH, S/O SRI.THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANTHINAGAR, BELURU-HALEBEEDU MAIN ROAD, BELUR TOWN-573 115, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI.NAIK.N.R., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶15

THE DIRECTOR, URBAN RURAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶16

THE MEMBER SECRETARY, BELURU-HALEBEEDU PLANNING AUTHORITY, NEAR TALUK OFFICE,

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34418-DB WA No. 115 of 2022

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

CHIKKAMAGALUR ROAD, BELUR, HASSAN DISTRICT-577 201.

¶20

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHAPURA SUB DIVISION, SAKALESHAPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201.

¶21

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MUNICIPALITY, BELUR HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201.

¶22

SMT.B.C.MOHAN KUMARI, W/O LATE B.C.MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KANAKADASA STREET, KOTE, BELUR TALUK-573 115. HEBBAL POST, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶23

SRI.DHARME GOWDA, S/O SRI.SANNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDENT OF SHIVALADAHALLI VILLAGE, HEBBAL POST, HALEBEEDU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK-573 115, HASSAN DISTRICT.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI.S.H.RAGHAVENDRA, AGA FOR R1, R2 AND R4 SRI.RAVISHANKAR.A., ADVOCATE FOR R3 SRI.A.NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R5

¶26

NC: 2025:KHC:34418-DB WA No. 115 of 2022

¶27

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO (I) SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN WP NO.25585/2019 (GM-MISC) DATED 17.11.2021 BY DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION MARKED AT ANNEXURE-C (II) GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S INCLUDING COST.

¶30

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND

¶31

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA

¶32

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶33

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶34

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for

¶35

withdrawal, which is also signed by the appellant.