Dismissed¶35

G K Vishwanath Rao v. a M Prasanna

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2025RFA/1270/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, RFA No. 1270 of 2014 (SP), decided 02-09-2025 by division bench (Jayant Banerji and Umesh M Adiga, JJ.; judgment per Jayant Banerji). Appeal under S.96 r/w Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 CPC against decree dated 19.4.2014 in O.S.No.4/2011 (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakleshpur) granting specific performance of contract. Dismissed for non-prosecution due to appellants' non-representation; respondent's counsel present. Merits not examined; no cases cited; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

The Regular First Appeal No. 1270 of 2014 is dismissed for non-prosecution, there being no representation for the appellants while learned counsel for the respondent was present. ¶35

G K Vishwanath Rao Vs a M Prasanna — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:34278-DB RFA No. 1270 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1270 OF 2014 (SP)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

G K VISHWANATH RAO SINDHIA (G.K.V. SINDHIA) SINCE DEAD BY LR'S

¶10

1(A) VINOD SINDHIA K AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶11

1(B) VINAY SINDHIA K AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶12

S/O G K VISHWANATH RAO SINDHIA

¶13

Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

N.P MUDDAMMA W/O G.K VISHWANATH RAO SINDHIA (G.K.V. SINDHIA) AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶15

G K BOJAMMA W/O G K VISHWANATH RAO SINDHIA (G K V SINDHIA) AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶16

ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO. A31/32, HUYUILUMANE VILLAGE, NAGAVALA POST, ILLAVALA HOBLI MYSORE-571 130.

¶17

…APPELLANTS

¶18

(BY SRI. SAMPAT ANAND SHETTY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶19

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:34278-DB RFA No. 1270 of 2014

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

AND:

¶22

A.M PRASANNA S/O LATE A.G. MANJUNATHA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O HEECHUVALLI ESTATE, HEECHUVALLI AND HALEKERE VILLAGE, GOIBEEDU HOBLI, POST BOX NO. 53, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 101.

¶23

…RESPONDENT

¶24

(BY SRI. ANAND BEERANNAVAR AND SMT. DURGADEVI R.,ADVOCATES (NOC NOT GIVEN), SRI.N.SHANKARNARAYANA BHAT, ADVOCATE (NOC NOT OBTAINED)

¶25

THIS RFA IS FILED U/SEC 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.4.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.4/2011 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPUR, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACT.

¶26

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

¶30

Learned counsel for the respondent is present.

¶31

There is no representation for the appellants.