Dismissed¶31

Mr Ramanna Poojary v. Mrs Leelavathi

Karnataka HC29 Jan 2025RSA/530/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru — RSA No. 530 of 2020 (PAR) — Justice K. Natarajan — 29.01.2025 — Regular second appeal under S.100 CPC dismissed as withdrawn on the appellant's settlement memo; no merits adjudication. Underlying chain: OS No.3/2013 (Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Belthangady, decree 28.02.2018) reversed in first appeal RA No.18/2018 (Prl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Belthangady, 14.10.2019). Parties: Ramanna Poojary (appellant) v. Leelavathi, Booda Poojary and Sundara Poojary (respondents). Pending interlocutory applications do not survive.

What did the court decide?

None; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the strength of the appellant's withdrawal memo indicating settlement between the parties. ¶31

Mr Ramanna Poojary Vs Mrs Leelavathi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:4149 RSA No. 530 of 2020

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2020 (PAR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR RAMANNA POOJARY, S/O LATE MR.BASPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOSUE, PARENKI VILLAGE, MADANTHYAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224.

¶9

APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR SHASTRY G.,ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by VEDAVATHI A K Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

MRS LEELAVATHI, W/O SUNDARA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 61YEARS, RESIDIGN AT KARAMBADA HOUSE, ULI VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT PIN – 574219.

¶14

BOODA POOJARY, S/O.LATE MR.BASAPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOUSE, PARENKY VILLAGE, MADANTHYAR POT, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224.

¶15

SUNDARA POOJARY, S/O LATE MR.BASAPAP POOJARY,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:4149 RSA No. 530 of 2020

¶18

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTE HOUE, PARENKI VILALGE, MADANTHYAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574224.

¶19

RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI. M RAJASHEKAR., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. TK MOHAN DAS FOR R1;

¶21

SRI. C PRAKASH REDDY., FOR R2; R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)

¶22

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC.,AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.10.2019 PASSED IN RA No.18/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANGADY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2018 PASSED IN OS No.3/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANGADY AND ETC,.

¶23

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN

¶25

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶26

Learned counsel for the appellant has field a memo for withdrawing the appeal and submits that there said to be settle between them.

¶27