Appeal against an interim order in a civil suit was withdrawn by the appellants' counsel on the ground that the parties had settled their dispute; the High Court dismissed the appeal and disposed of pending interlocutory applications.
Appeal dismissed as settled out of court; pending IAs disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2025:KHC:3711 MFA No. 4980 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4980 OF 2018 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: High Court of Karnataka
ALL DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS ARE R/AT NO.45, 2ND MAIN, RARAJISU BUILDING, 4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, BANGALORE-560 079.
(NOTE: DEFENDANT NO.5 NOT MADE PARTY SINCE NO RELIEF IS SOUGHT AGAINST HER)
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SUBASH REDDY V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2025:KHC:3711 MFA No. 4980 of 2018
S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, TRUSTEE-"RAJAHAMSA EDUCATION TRUST"
BOTH ARE R/AT INDLAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562 106.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHWETHA RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2018 PASSED ON IA NO.2&3 IN O.S.NO.5004/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE 3RD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, ANEKAL, ALLOWING IA NO.2 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 OF CPC, REJECTING IA NO.3 FILED U/O.39 RULE 4 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
NC: 2025:KHC:3711 MFA No. 4980 of 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants filed memo for withdrawing the appeal on the ground that matter between the parties is already settled.
Court.
Any pending IAs do not survive for consideration. Hence, they are also disposed of.
Sd/(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE
tsn*
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. L Radha
Smt. M Shilpa
Smt. M Prathiba
Kum. M Sadhana
Sri M Huchappa
S Nanjamma
K.Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
