Dismissed¶30
Sri Govindappa v. Narasimhappa
Karnataka HCRSA/1988/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Condonation of delay 2334 days; more than 8 years; each day delay to be explained; Section 100 CPC; RSA No.1988 of 2021; Karnataka High Court; H.P. Sandesh; permanent injunction; O.S.No.211/1998; R.A.No.130/2006; Execution Case No.31/2021 not sufficient cause; I.A.No.1/2021 rejected; appeal dismissed; Chickballapur; concurrent finding.
What did the court decide?
Each day's delay must be explained when filing an appeal; the affidavit assigned no reason for the delay of more than 8 years, did not state when the appellant came to know of the First Appellate Court's judgment despite being represented by counsel there, and therefore in the absence of valid reasons and explanation the delay of 2334 days cannot be condoned. ¶30