The court dismissed a regular second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC due to non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1988 OF 2021 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI JAI PRAKASH REDDY M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.08.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.130/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHICKBALLAPUR. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.07.2006 PASSED IN O.S.NO.211/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPUR.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The office objections not complied and also cost not paid. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non compliance vide order dated 31.8.2023.
Sd/JUDGE
AP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26
Sri Govindappa
Narasimhappa
Venkatesh
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
