Dismissed¶41

Smt Jayamma v. Smt Thimmamma

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2025RSA/1587/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 1587/2018, High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 02.09.2025 by Dr. Justice K. Manmadha Rao. Dismissal of Regular Second Appeal (under Section 100 CPC) for non-appearance of appellant's counsel, following conditional order dated 06.08.2025; I.A. Nos. 1/2024 and 2/2024 also dismissed. Appeal arose from decree in R.A. No. 12/2014 (Channapattana) reversing judgment/decree dated 03.05.2014 in O.S. No. 81/2008. Parties: Jayamma v. Thimmamma and Puttathayamma. No arguments, no issues framed, no precedents cited, no quantum - of no precedential value on merits.

What did the court decide?

In view of the conditional order dated 06.08.2025 (which had warned that the applications would stand dismissed without reference to Court if counsel for the appellant did not appear), I.A.Nos.1/2024 and 2/2024 are dismissed. ¶40

Smt Jayamma Vs Smt Thimmamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶2

BEFORE

¶3

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶4

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1587 OF 2018(PAR)

BETWEEN:

SMT. JAYAMMA,

WIFE OF KARIGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

RESIDING AT KONDAPURA VILLAGE,

¶10

VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI,

¶11

CHANNAPATNA TALUK,

¶12

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 138.

¶13

...APPELLANT/S

¶14

(By Sri./Smt : NATARAJ BABA K., ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

SMT. THIMMAMMA,

¶17

WIFE OF LATE KARIGOWDA,

¶18

AGED ABOUT 56 YERAS,

¶19

RESIDING AT KONDAPURA VILLGE,

¶20

VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI,

¶21

CHANNAPATNA TALUK,

¶22

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 562 138.

…2

RSA NO. 1587/2018

SMT. PUTTATHAYAMMA,

¶27

WIFE OF LATE PUTTARAMEGOWDA,

¶28

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

¶29

RESIDING AT JAGADHAPURA VILLGE, CHANNAPATNA TALUK,

¶30

RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT-562 138 …..RESPONDENT/S

¶31

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD 21.06.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.12/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHANNAPATTANA ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.05.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.81/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHANNAPATNA.

¶32

This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

None appears for the appellant.

¶35

It appears that on 06.08.2025, this Court granted two weeks time for appearance of counsel for the appellant, failing which, the applications shall stand dismissed without reference to Court.

…3

RSA NO. 1587/2018

In view of the above conditional order dated 06.08.2025,

¶40

I.A.Nos.1/2024 and 2/2024 are dismissed.

¶41

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 02.09.2025, no appearance of counsel for the appellant, hence the appeal is hereby dismissed.

¶42