Dismissed¶29

D B Sathish v. M/S Jai Padmavathi Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Karnataka HC1 Sept 2025WP/23506/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court; WP No. 23506 of 2022 (GM-CPC); Article 227 Constitution of India; D B Sathish v. M/s Jai Padmavathi Developers Pvt Ltd; Dr. Justice K. Manmadha Rao; decided 01.09.2025; challenge to common order dated 02.11.2022 on IA Nos. 4 & 5 in O.S. No. 1960/2005 (XXIV Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, CCH-6, Bengaluru); written statement permitted on cost of Rs. 300/- by trial court order dated 07-07-2025; withdrawal memo dated 08.07.2025; not pressed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no merits adjudicated; no case law cited; citation NC: 2025:KHC:34237.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn (as not pressed) on the petitioner's memo dated 08.07.2025; no substantive relief granted and no ruling on merits. ¶29

D B Sathish Vs M/S Jai Padmavathi Developers Pvt. Ltd. — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:34237 WP No. 23506 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 23506 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

D B SATHISH,

¶9

S/O LATE D B BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.105, 20^TH CROSS, 7^TH MAIN ROAD, 4^TH STAGE,

¶10

3RD BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 079.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. B S KRISHNA., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

M/S JAI PADMAVATHI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, AT NO.332/7, 2ND FLOOR, NO.204, SURAJ GANGA ARCADE JAYANAGAR, 2ND BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 011.

¶15

Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, PRAGOSHA DINESH BALAR, REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT, 1956.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMON ORDER DATED 02.11.2022 PASSED ON IA NO.4 AND 5 IN OS.NO.1960/2005 BY THE HONBLE COURT OF XXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, CCH-6, BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:34237 WP No. 23506 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo on 08.07.2025 for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶25

" The Petitioner submits that vide Order dated 07-07-2025 the Hon'ble trial court (C.C.H 6) has permitted the Petitioner herein to file the Written Statement on cost of Rs.300/- pursuant to no objection by the Respondent herein.

¶26

In view of the above circumstance, the present memo is filed seeking permission of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the above petition as not pressed and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn."

¶27

Memo is taken on record.

¶28

In view of the above memo, writ petition is

¶29

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶30

Sd/(DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

¶31

KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

D B Sathish v. M/S Jai Padmavathi Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D B Sathish v. M/S Jai Padmavathi Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nanjundaiah Vs Javaregowda

Sri a M Gopala Reddy Vs Sri S Venkatarayappa

Sri Suresh Pothugunta Vs Smt Venkatalakshmamma

Sri Bangalore v Ramakrishna Vs Smt Pushpalatha

Skylark Mansions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jc Decaux Adverstising India Pvt. Ltd.

Sri L Sreenivasaiah Vs Roopa