Disposed¶34

G C Nataraj v. Smt B M Kathyayini

Karnataka HC7 Nov 2025RFA/422/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Settlement disposal - Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), RFA No. 422 of 2014, E.S. Indiresh J, decided 07-11-2025. Defendant-appellant G.C. Nataraj v. plaintiff-respondent Smt. B.M. Kathyayini; appeal under SEC.96 OF CPC against decree dated 12.12.2013 in O.S.No.8320/2008 (XIV Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengaluru) decreeing suit for declaration and damages. Parties filed joint memo dated 07.11.2025; appeal disposed of in terms of joint memo; decree modified; admissible court fee refund directed to appellant. No issues framed, no cases cited, no quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of in terms of the joint memo dated 07.11.2025; judgment and decree in O.S.No.8320/2008 modified accordingly; refund of admissible court fee to the appellant on due identification. ¶34

G C Nataraj Vs Smt B M Kathyayini — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:45181 RFA No. 422 of 2014

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 422 OF 2014

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

G.C. NATARAJ S/O LATE G. CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.393/40/5 (OLD NO 303/40/3) 19^TH MAIN ROAD, 1^ST BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 010

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. GURUDATH B.S, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SMT. B.M. KATHYAYINI W/O LATE SIDDRAMANNA C.G AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S R/AT NO.393/40 Location: HIGH 19^TH MAIN ROAD, 1^ST BLOCK COURT OF KARNATAKA RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE-560 010

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. M.B. CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE)

¶15

THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.8320/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV-ADDL. CITY CIVIL

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:45181 RFA No. 422 of 2014

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND DAMAGES.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶22

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

This Regular First Appeal is preferred by the defendant assailing the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2013, on the file of XIV Additional City Civil Judge at Bengaluru, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶25

parties

¶26

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submitted that the parties to the lis have settled the matter, accordingly, the parties are filing the joint memo, dated 07.11.2025.

¶27

Having taken note of the joint memo, as the

¶28

parties have agreed to settle the matter amicably, in

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:45181 RFA No. 422 of 2014

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

terms of joint memo, the Regular First Appeal is

¶33

disposed of in terms of joint memo in terms. In that view of the matter, the judgment and decree passed in OS No. 8320 of 2008 is accordingly, modified.

¶34

In view of the settlement between the parties, the Registry is directed the refund the admissible court fee to the appellant herein on due identification.

¶35

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶36

G C Nataraj v. Smt B M Kathyayini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G C Nataraj v. Smt B M Kathyayini

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Gopal T R Vs the Range Forest Officer

Sri Tarun Gawri Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Nigel P L Monteriro Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri v Nanda Kumar Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Sri C R Sathyanarayana Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Lakshmi Vs the State by