Sri K M Mohammed Akbar v. Sri M B Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution of a Section 96 CPC regular first appeal (RFA No. 1191 of 2008) against the 29.07.2008 decree in OS.No. 10831/1997 (XXVIII Addl. City Civil Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore) dismissing a suit for declaration and permanent injunction; appellant absent after Court Notice held sufficiently served; no merits decided; Karnataka HC, V Srishananda J, 20 November 2025.
What did the court decide?
Service of the Court Notice issued to the appellant was held sufficient notwithstanding the absence of the appellant/counsel. ¶10