Dismissed¶34

Sri Hanumantharayappa v. Sri Ranganathappa

Karnataka HC19 Nov 2025CRP/512/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRP No. 512 of 2025 (IO); decided 19.11.2025 by V Srishananda, J.; CRP under S.115 CPC against rejection of IA No. II in Ex. No. 4/2019 (Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Madhugiri); provisions referenced: Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC and Section 11 PTCL Act (cause title also prints 'U/S. IX OF CPC'); dismissed as withdrawn at admission stage on counsel's memo seeking liberty to file appropriate application for rejection/dismissal of the execution petition; no merits adjudication, no case law discussed.

What did the court decide?

None on merits. Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn upon memo of petitioners' counsel requesting withdrawal with liberty to file an appropriate application for rejection/dismissal of the execution petition; the Court expressly recorded only that the memo was placed on record. ¶34

Sri Hanumantharayappa Vs Sri Ranganathappa — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:47878 CRP No. 512 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 512 OF 2025 (IO)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

¶10

SMT. DEEPA, D/O HANUMATHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶11

SRI. BALAJI, S/O HANUMATHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶12

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SRI.VENKATESH BABU S/O HANUMATHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶14

ALL ARE RESIDING AT VADDARAHATTI, HAMLET OF GARANI VILLAGE, ID HALLY HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 101.

¶15

…PETITIONERS

¶16

(BY SRI. RONALD, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIVEK S, ADVOCATE)

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:47878 CRP No. 512 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

AND:

¶20

SRI. RANGANATHAPPA S/O KAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/O OF HOSAKOTE, HAMLET OF GARANI VILLAGE, ID HALLY HOBLI, MADHUGIRI TALUK - 572 101.

¶21

…RESPONDENT

¶22

(BY SRI. K.N. NITHISH, ADVOCATE)

¶23

THIS CRP FILED U/S 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2025. PASSED ON IA NO. II IN EX NO. 4/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE C/C. PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI, REJECTING THE IA NO. II FILED U/S. IX OF CPC R/W ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) OF CPC AND SEC. 11 OF PTCL ACT.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Sri.Ronald, learned counsel appearing on behalf of

¶28

Sri.Vivek S., learned counsel for the revision petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶29

"The petitioners withdraw the above petition with a liberty to file appropriate application for rejection of execution petition. Accordingly, petition may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate application for dismissal of execution petition prays as prayed.”

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC:47878 CRP No. 512 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

Placing the memo on record, revision petition is

¶34

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA)

¶36