Disposed¶34

Sri a C Ramakrishnappa v. Smt Puttalingamma

Karnataka HC16 Dec 2025MFA/2175/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; NC: 2025:KHC:53588; MFA No. 2175 of 2025 (CPC); decided 16.12.2025 by Justice Hanchate Sanjeevkumar; interim-injunction appeal disposed of with restraint on alienation of suit schedule property and construction thereon till disposal of suit; Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC; Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC; O.S.No.527/2025; order dated 07.03.2025; suit for declaration, possession, mandatory injunction and mesne profits; parties: A.C. Ramakrishnappa (appellant) v. Puttalingamma and Nagarathna (respondents); advocates: B.V. Badrinath, Chokka Reddy.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the defendants not to alienate the suit schedule property along with construction made on it, till the disposal of the suit. ¶34

Sri a C Ramakrishnappa Vs Smt Puttalingamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:53588 MFA No. 2175 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2175 OF 2025 (CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. A.C. RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O. LATE A.S. CHINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR WATER TANK, AMRUTHAHALLI BUS-STAND, SAHAKARA NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 092.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. B.V. BADRINATH, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SMT. PUTTALINGAMMA W/O. LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT KASAPURA VILLAGE, MEDIGESHI HOBLI, MADHUGERI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 132

¶14

SMT. NAGARATHNA, W/O. LATE HANUMANTHU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.411, BEHIND RENUKA YELLAMMA TEMPLE, SRI.CHAKRESHWARI ASHRAMA, AMRUTHAHALLI, SAHAKARANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 092

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. CHOKKA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2)

¶17

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.527/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDITIONAL CITY

¶18

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:53588 MFA No. 2175 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-41), DISMISSING THE I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.

¶21

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶23

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶24

The appeal is filed by the plaintiff questioning the order dated 07.03.2025 passed on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.527/2025 by the Court of the XL Additional City

¶25

Civil & Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City (CCH-41), whereby the trial Court has dismissed the application filed for temporary injunction.

¶26

The plaintiff has filed suit for declaration, possession, mandatory injunction and mesne profits.

¶27

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff that since the application filed for temporary injunction is dismissed, the defendants have started construction and completed the construction of building. Therefore, prays to dispose of the appeal with a

¶28