Dismissed¶46

M/S. Markon Developers v. Smt. S. G. Shruthi

Karnataka HC15 Dec 2025MFA/8698/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

withdrawal of appeal; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file appeal before appropriate forum; memo by counsel; MFA under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC; challenge to order allowing I.A.No.1 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC; O.S.No.1073/2022 Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Anekal; Section 14 Limitation Act 1963 exclusion of time; certified copies returned; Markon Developers v. S.G. Shruthi and others; High Court of Karnataka 2025; Hanchate Sanjeevkumar.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal before the appropriate forum; time spent prosecuting the appeal before this Court excluded for limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963; Registry directed to return all certified copies to the appellant/counsel for the appellant. ¶46

M/S. Markon Developers Vs Smt. S. G. Shruthi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:53293 MFA No. 8698 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8698 OF 2025 (CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶9

M/S. MARKON DEVELOPERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 73, 1ST FLOOR, KRISHNA KARTHIK NILAYA, LRDE EMPLOYEES HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LAYOUT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE, KRISHNARAJAPURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU - 560 057 P RESENTLY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT MARKON MADHURA GARDEN SY. NO. 47 AND 49, SORAHUNSE VILLAGE, NEAR MADURMBIKA TEMPLE, BEHIND KPTCL SUBSTATION VARTHUR, BENGALURU - 560 087 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRINIVASULU KONDAMURI.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI. SAMMITH S, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SMT. S. G. SHRUTHI D/O LATE S.V. GOPAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO. 202, ELEGANT PARADISE APARTMENT , 2ND FLOOR, 18TH MAIN, NARAYANA NAGAR LAYOUT, DODDAKALLASANDRA BENGALURU - 560 062.

¶14

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:53293 MFA No. 8698 of 2025

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

SMT.YASHODAMMA W/O LATE S.V. GOPAL AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS

¶17

SRI. S.G. SHASHI KUMAR S/O LATE S.V. GOPAL AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶18

SRI. P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVAS S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶19

SMT. KRISHNAVENI D/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS

¶20

SMT. SAROJAMMA D/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS

¶21

SMT. SHANTHAMMA W/O P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVAS AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS

¶22

SRI. PRADEED S/O P.V. SRINIVAS AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶23

SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O P.V. SRINIVASAIAH @ SRINIVAS AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS

¶24

SRI. SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS

¶25

SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O SRINIVAS REDDY AGE ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶26

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:53293 MFA No. 8698 of 2025

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

SMT. MANJULA D/O SRINIVAS REDDY AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶29

SMT. MANJULA D/O SRINIVAS REDDY AGE ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶30

SRI. NAVEEN S/O SRINIVAS REDDY AGE ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶31

SRI. S.K. CHANDRA REDDY S/O K C KONDA REDDY AGE ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶32

SRI. CHETHAN REDDY S/O S K CHANDRA REDDY AGE ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶33

KUM. MONISH REDDY D/O S.K. CHANDRA REDDY AGE ABOUT 20 YEARS

¶34

RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 17 ARE RESIDING AT SARJAPURA VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL - 562 106.

¶35

…RESPONDENTS

¶36

THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 12.08.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO. 1 IN O.S.NO.1073/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, ALLOWING IA NO. 1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC.

¶37

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶38

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR

¶39

¶40

NC: 2025:KHC:53293 MFA No. 8698 of 2025

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶43

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file appeal before the appropriate forum.

¶44