Dismissed¶27

Sri.Manjunath S/O Timmanna Hulmani v. Smt.Laxmi W/O Manjunath Hulamani

Karnataka HC18 Sept 2025MFA/100665/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of matrimonial appeal by memo; appeal dismissed as withdrawn / not pressed; MFA No. 100665 of 2019 (MC); Hindu Marriage Act 1955 S. 28(1), S. 13, S. 25; judgment and decree dated 19.12.2018 in Matrimonial Case No. 36/2016, Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mudhol; oral order per Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil with Justice S. Sunil Dutt Yadav; High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench; decided 18.09.2025.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn on the appellant's memo stating the case was already settled. ¶27

Sri.Manjunath S/O Timmanna Hulmani Vs Smt.Laxmi… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:12386-DB MFA No. 100665 of 2019

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

¶6

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.100665 OF 2019 (MC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. MANJUNATH S/O TIMMANNA HULAMANI AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: ELECTRICIAN, R/O:SHIVALLI, TQ: DHARWAD.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SMT. SUNITHA P. KALASOOR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

SMT. LAXMI W/O MANJUNATH HULAMANI AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: SHIVALLI, TQ: DHARWAD. NOW AT C/O: NAGAPPA GURAPPA BANDIWADDAR, BANDIWADDAR GALLI, WARD NO.3, MUCHOL.

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE)

¶15

Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶16

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.28(1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2018, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.36/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, MUDHOL, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC. 13 AND 25 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 & ETC.

¶17

THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶18

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND

¶19

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12386-DB MFA No. 100665 of 2019

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL)

¶25

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. The memo reads as under:

¶26

It is submitted that the above mentioned case already settled and appellant does not want to precipitate the matter so that the appeal become infructuous. Appellant has signed this memo. Hence, it is kindly prayed this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the matter as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity.

¶27

In view of the said memo, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Sd/(S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶29

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE

¶30

JTR CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1

Sri.Manjunath S/O Timmanna Hulmani v. Smt.Laxmi W/O Manjunath Hulamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.Manjunath S/O Timmanna Hulmani v. Smt.Laxmi W/O Manjunath Hulamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bannigola Rangappa Since Deceased by Lrs Vs Shri. C S Chandrashekera Gali

Shri Beereshwar Vividh Uddeshagal Sahakar Sangh Vs the State of Karnataka

Waliallah S/O. Allabaksh Yadwad, Vs Karnataka State Board of Auqaf

Smt Saraswati W/O Vasant Madava Hegadekatte Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Laxmi Nemani Mense Vs Nitin Balawant Hangirgekar

Sri. Parbhaiah Chikkamath S/O Kallaiah Vs Smt. v. Rashmi Mahesh