Dismissed¶38

Sri. R R Sathyamurthy v. Sri. N v Venkataraju

Karnataka HC28 Oct 2025CRP/732/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, CRP No. 732 of 2023 (V Srishananda J., 28-10-2025): CRP under S.115 CPC challenging order dated 22.09.2023 in Misc. No. 118/2023 (Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar) directing return of original documents; dismissed as withdrawn on memo filed by petitioners' counsel (Pranav Kumar M.). No merits decided; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn ¶38

Sri. R R Sathyamurthy Vs Sri. N v Venkataraju — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:42961 CRP No. 732 of 2023

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 732 OF 2023 (M)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. R R SATHYAMURTHY S/O LATE RAMACHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

¶10

SMT S PANKAJAM W/O R R SATHYAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

BOTH ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.11/26 THELKARADU STREET 4TH CROSS, RANGASAMUTHIRAM SATHYAMANGALAM ERODE DISTRICT TAMIL NADU STATE - 638 402

¶13

(BY SRI. PRANAV KUMAR M., ADVOCATE)

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI. N V VENKATARAJU S/O LATE VENKATEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS

¶17

SRI N V VENKATESH S/O LATE VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:42961 CRP No. 732 of 2023

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

LAKSHMI

¶22

D/O N V VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶23

SUJATHA D/O N V VENAKTARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶24

VASANTHA D/O N V VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶25

N V RAGHU S/O N V VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶26

ALL ARE RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.3070, 8^TH CROSS R.P. ROAD, NANJANAGUDU TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SRI. SANGAMESH R.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 AND R6)

¶29

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.09.2023 PASSED IN MISC. NO. 118/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR, WHEREIN IT IS ORDERED TO RETURN ALL THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS TO THE PETITIONER THEREIN IMMEDIATELY.

¶30

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

¶31

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶32

¶33

NC: 2025:KHC:42961 CRP No. 732 of 2023

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶36

ORAL ORDER

¶37

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under:

¶38

"The counsel for the petitioners is hereby seeking permission of this Hon'ble court to withdraw the present Civil Revision Petition as per the instructions of the Petitioners. Accordingly, this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioners to withdraw the same in the interest of justice and equity."

¶39

Placing the memo on record, the petition stands

¶40

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶41

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶42

SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21 CT:SG

Sri. R R Sathyamurthy v. Sri. N v Venkataraju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. R R Sathyamurthy v. Sri. N v Venkataraju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Yousuff Vs State of Karnataka

Sri.Rangaswamy N.M. Vs Sri.D.K.Srinivas

Mr Mohammed Khasim Jane Alias Mohammed Khasim Saheb Vs Sri K.Narayana Reddy

Sri. P.G. Radhakrishna Gupta Vs Dr. B.N. Lakshmikanth

Smt. Veena. N Vs Sri. Lohith Naik. S

R. Kadurappa Vs S K Madhu