Disposed¶39

Sri Doddegowda v. Smt. Umadevi

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2025CRP/72/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC, CRP No. 72 of 2025 (IO), M. Nagaprasanna J., decided 12.06.2025; revision petition under Section 115 CPC against dismissal (order dated 04.01.2025) of I.A.No.V under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of plaint in O.S.No.353/2016, II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Nelamangala; disposed as withdrawn pursuant to counsel's memo seeking liberty to file a fresh writ petition; no substantive adjudication, no issues framed, no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the Civil Revision Petition in terms of the memo filed by counsel for the petitioner (the memo sought liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition and return of certified copies) ¶39

Sri Doddegowda Vs Smt. Umadevi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:20281 CRP No. 72 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 72 OF 2025 (IO)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. DODDEGOWDA, S/O LATE GORIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT MUDDALINGNAHALLI VILLAGE, THYMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 132.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SMT. GEETHA S, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

SMT. UMADEVI, W/O SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶15

SRI. H. NATARAJU, S/O LATE HONNEGOWDA @ HONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶16

SRI. M.H. LOKESH, S/O LATE HONNEGOWDA @ HONNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶17

SMT. ANNAPURNAMMA W/O LATE GAGAREVANNA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS

¶18

¶19

NC: 2025:KHC:20281 CRP No. 72 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

SMT. VEENA, W/O LATE SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶22

SRI HARISH G, S/O LATE GANGAREVANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶23

ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 132.

¶24

SRI. RAJASHEKARA S/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

¶25

SRI. ESHWARA S/O LATE REVANASIDDAPPA, GRANDSON OF LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶26

ALL ARE RESIDING AT MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 132.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.01.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.V IN OS.NO.353/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.V FILED UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF CPC FOR AMEND THE PLAINT.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:20281 CRP No. 72 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo

¶36

seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶37

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶38

The undersigned counsel appearing for the petitioner respectfully submits that kindly grant the permission to withdrawal the Crp with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition and kindly direct the office to return the certified copies which is filed in the above Crp. Hence this memo, same may be taken on record, in the interest of justice and eqity."

¶39

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.

¶40

Sd/(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

¶41

JY List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3 CT: BHK

Sri Doddegowda v. Smt. Umadevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Doddegowda v. Smt. Umadevi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. M. Subramani Naidu Vs Smt. Jayamma

Smt Puttamma Vs Smt Jayanthi

Purva Zentech Business Park Vs Smt M Jayalakshmi

Sri Kemparaju Vs State of Karnataka

Mr v Varadaraju Vs the Principal Secretary

Sri Krishnappa Vs Smt Narayanamma