Sri. Dayalan v. Kum. a. Anusha
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (single judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice V Srishananda), Oral Order dated 03.12.2025 in CRP No. 57 of 2019 (SC). Revision petition under S.18 of the Small Causes Court Act against the ejectment decree dated 03.01.2019 in SC.No.363/2018 (XXIII Addl. Small Causes Judge, Bangalore), which also involved arrears of rent. Petitioner Sri. Dayalan repeatedly absent; no representation on hearing date or previous date; suo motu adjournment from 26.11.2025. Dismissed for non-prosecution. No precedents discussed; no monetary quantum stated. Respondents: Kum. A. Anusha and Kum. A Poornima (minor, represented by mother Smt. Manjula V); advocates: R. Theanmoli (petitioner); Shivaprasad S and Mahesh Kumar K.M (respondents).
What did the court decide?
Taking note of the fact of consistent absence of the revision petitioner (no representation either on the hearing date or on the previous date, despite a suo motu adjournment from 26.11.2025), the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.