Dismissed¶¶30

Mr Mohammed Inayathulla v. Al Mubarak Educational Trust(Regd)

Karnataka HC2 Dec 2025CRP/198/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (NC: 2025:KHC:50312); CRP No. 198 of 2022 (IO) under S.115 CPC; decided 02.12.2025 by V Srishananda, J. Petitioners Mohammed Inayathulla and Abdul Subhan (counsel Syed Imran) v. Al Mubarak Educational Trust (Regd.) (counsel Naveed Ahmed). Impugned order dated 25.01.2019 on I.A.No.3 in O.S.No.3816/2018 (XXX Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru) rejecting I.A.No.3 under S.85 Waqf Act 1995. CRP dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo, with liberty to file fresh CRP or other petition; fresh I.A. on S.9 CPC issue pending before Trial Court. No merits decided; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the CRP and to file a fresh CRP or any other petition urging the grounds. ¶¶30

Mr Mohammed Inayathulla Vs Al Mubarak Educational Trust(Regd) — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:50312 CRP No. 198 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.198 OF 2022 (IO)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MR MOHAMMED INAYATHULLA S/O ABDUL HAKEEM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.26/C ANKAPPA BLOCK, J C NAGAR BANGALORE – 560 006

¶10

ABDUL SUBHAN S/O ABDUL KHALIQ AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.14, 3^RD CROSS KEMAPAIAH BLOCK J C NAGAR BANGALORE -560 006

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

(BY SRI SYED IMRAN, ADVOCATE)

¶13

Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

AND:

¶15

AL MUBARAK EDUCATIONAL TRUST(REGD) MUBARAK MOHALLA KEMPAIAH BLOCK, JC NAGAR BANGALORE 560 006 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY

¶16

…RESPONDENT

¶17

(BY SRI NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE)

¶18

THIS CRP FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.01.2019 PASSED ON I.A.NO.3 IN O.S.NO.3816/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:50312 CRP No. 198 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, REJECTING THE I.A.NO.3 FILED UNDER SECTION 85 OF WAQF ACT OF 1995.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed

¶27

memo, which reads as under:

¶28

“The petitioner submits as hereunder that the petitioner have filed I.A., before the Hon’ble Trial Court in O.S.No.3816/2018 to consider the issue of law raised regarding Section 9 of CPC and the Trial Court has posted the said case for order on I.A. As such, the petitioner prays to withdraw the above CRP with a liberty to file fresh CRP or any other petition urging the grounds.”

¶29

Placing the memo on record, revision petition is

¶30

dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

¶31

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶32

Mr Mohammed Inayathulla v. Al Mubarak Educational Trust(Regd)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Mohammed Inayathulla v. Al Mubarak Educational Trust(Regd)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Bhanmathi Vs Smt. Shwetha. S

Shivamurthy Vs Mahadevamma

Dr. C B Kavana Vs Dr.G. Sagar Hangaragi

Smt S Lakshmidevi Vs Viha K

Sri M Kantharaj Vs Smt Krishnamma Now Deceased Represented

Smt.Shweta Bhat Vs Sri.Vijay Satish Ganachari