Dismissed¶35

M/S Tamarind Multi Cuisine Bar and Restaurant v. Smt. Sarasamma

Karnataka HC21 Nov 2025CRP/428/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court Bengaluru; Justice V Srishananda; CRP No. 428 of 2023 (IO); NC: 2025:KHC:48352; Tamarind Multi Cuisine Bar and Restaurant; Vijay Kumar Raju; Sarasamma; Srinivasulu G; C. Nagabhushan; Praveen Kumar Modgil; O.S. No.6229/2017; I.A. No.18; Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC; Section 115 CPC; Sections 8 and 9 KSCC Act; order dated 3.07.2023; final decree dated 23.08.2024; withdrawal memo; infructuous; dismissed as withdrawn; CCH-2 Bengaluru.

What did the court decide?

No relief on merits. On a memo filed by learned counsel for the revision petitioner stating the petition had become infructuous (final decree passed in the suit on 23.08.2024 and appeal filed), the memo was placed on record and the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶35

M/S Tamarind Multi Cuisine Bar and Restaurant Vs Smt. Sarasamma — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:48352 CRP No. 428 of 2023

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 428 OF 2023 (IO)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S. TAMARIND MULTI CUISINE BAR AND RESTAURANT, A REGISTERED FIRM OF PARTNERS, NO 113/2B, HORAMAVU VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 043 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, SRI. VIJAY KUMAR RAJU.

¶10

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SRI. VIJAY KUMAR RAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O JAYARAMA RAJU, PARTNER, TAMARIND BAR AND RESTAURANT, NO. 113/2B, HORAMAVU VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 043

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY MS. CHAITRA PATTAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MILIND DANGE, ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

SMT. SARASAMMA MAJOR, W/O SRI. P. NAGARAJ,

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:48352 CRP No. 428 of 2023

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

FLAT NO. 204, 2ND FLOOR, RAMMURTHY NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 043.

¶19

SRI SRINIVASULU G MAJOR S/O NARASIMHAIAH, MANAGING PARTNER TAMARIND BAR AND RESTAURANT 747, BANASWADI, 2ND B MAIN, OMBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 043.

¶20

SRI. C. NAGABHUSHAN MAJOR S/O CHINNAPPA REDDY PARTNER, TAMARIND BAR AND RESTAURANT NO 6, FIREWOOD DEPOT, 5TH MAIN, OMBR LAYOUT, PILLAREDDY NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 043.

¶21

SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR MODGIL MAJOR S/O PARAMANANDA MODGIL PARTNER, TAMARIND BAR AND RESTAURANT NO. 1276, 6TH CROSS, KUNDANAHALLY D BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 037

¶22

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. TEJASWINI RAJKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

¶23

THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 3.07.2023 PASSED IN OS NO.6229/2017 ON THE FILE OF IST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-2) DISMISSING THE IA. NO.18

¶24

3 - NC: 2025:KHC:48352 CRP No. 428 of 2023

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) OF CPC R/W SEC.8 AND 9 OF KSCC, ACT.

¶27

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a

¶31

memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶32

"The petitioner in the above case submits as follows:

¶33

The petitioner in this case seeks for a withdrawal of the present petition as the Trial Court on 23.08.2024 has passed a final decree in the suit and the appeal is been filed. Since the petition has been come infructuous the petitioner herein seeks the permission of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the present petition in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶34

Placing the memo on record, revision petition is

¶35

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶36

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶37

KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

M/S Tamarind Multi Cuisine Bar and Restaurant v. Smt. Sarasamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Tamarind Multi Cuisine Bar and Restaurant v. Smt. Sarasamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K M Mohammed Akbar Vs Sri M B Ramachandran

Sri Markandaiah Naidu Vs Sri D Venkatesh

Smt.Supriya Acharya Vs Shri.Shivaram Naik M

Sri. Vitobha Rukma Bai Devara Bhandaram Vs Sri. Hanumantha Kamath

Pira Scientific (Opc) Pvt. Limited Vs Novo Nordisk India Private Limited

Mailappa Gowda Vs Smt Janaki