Dismissed¶46

Dr. C B Kavana v. Dr.G. Sagar Hangaragi

Karnataka HC1 Dec 2025CP/368/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), CP No. 368 of 2025, decided 01-12-2025 by V Srishananda, J. Wife's Sec. 24 CPC petition to transfer matrimonial case M.C.No.223/2025 from Family Court Vijayapura to Chitradurga dismissed; video conferencing held to negate geographical distance and financial constraint grounds; Trial Judge directed to allow the wife's video-conference appearance on request. Respondent served but unrepresented; no precedent relied upon.

What did the court decide?

No transfer ordered; civil petition dismissed. Direction issued that if the petitioner-wife applies, the Family Court, Vijayapura shall permit her to appear through video conferencing. ¶46

Dr. C B Kavana Vs Dr.G. Sagar Hangaragi — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:49968 CP No. 368 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL PETITION NO. 368 OF 2025

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

DR. C.B. KAVANA D/O SRI BASAVARAJ K. W/O DR. G. SAGAR HANGARGIRI AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT 2^ND CROSS NEAR PROFESSOR SHIVLINGAPPA HOUSE VITHAL NAGAR CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA - 577 522

¶9

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶10

PRESENTLY R/AT DR C B KAVANA C/O S.N. VISHVANTHA S/O S A NARAYANAMURTHY KARTVINAKATTE CIRCLE KABEERANANDA NAGARA CHITRADURGA - 577 501

¶11

…PETITIONER (BY SMT. TEJASWINI K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SIDDAPPA B.M., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

DR. G. SAGAR HANGARAGI S/O LATE GURUPADAPPA AGE ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A BAGALER ONI YARGAL B K SINDAGI TALUK VIJAYAPURA - 586 123

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

(RESPONDENT - DR. G. SAGAR HANGARAGI - SERVED)

¶16

¶17

NC: 2025:KHC:49968 CP No. 368 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC. 24 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE. 1908., PRAYING TO WITHDRAW THE M.C.NO.223/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE PRL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, VIJAYAPURA AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT AT CHITRADURGA, BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION IN THE ABOVE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Heard Smt. Tejaswini K., for Sri B.M.Siddappa,

¶24

learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶25

The petition under Section 24 of the CPC filed by the

¶26

wife with the following prayer:

¶27

"THEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to withdraw the M.C.No.223/2025 pending on the file of the Principle Judge Family Court, Vijayapura and transfer the same to the Senior Civil Judge court at Chitradura, by allowing this petition in the interest of justice and equity."

¶28

Facts in the nutshell, which are utmost necessary

¶29

for disposal of the present petition, are as under:

¶30

¶31

NC: 2025:KHC:49968 CP No. 368 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

On account of the strained relationship between the petitioner and the respondent, a petition for divorce came to be filed by the respondent against the petitioner on the file of Prl. Judge Family Court, Vijayapura.

¶34

The wife is now residing in the parental house at Chitradurga and therefore she has sought for the transfer of the said matrimonial proceedings to the court at Chitradurga on account of geographical distance and financial implications.

¶35

None appears for the respondent.

¶36

Having heard the arguments of Smt. Tejaswini for B.M.Siddappa, this court perused the material on record meticulously.

¶37

Having noted that geographical distance and financial constraints are no longer valid parameters to transfer a pending case from one court to another court in

¶38

¶39

NC: 2025:KHC:49968 CP No. 368 of 2025

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

view of the video conferencing facility, the petition needs to be dismissed.

¶42

The petitioner can effectively appear before the court at Vijayapura from Chitradurga through video conferencing and effectively participate in the matrimonial proceedings.

¶43

If the wife files an application before the court at Vijayapura seeking permission to appear through video conferencing, the learned Trial Judge, Family Court, Vijayapura shall permit the wife to appear through video conferencing.

¶44

With that direction, the following:

¶45

ORDER

¶46

The civil petition stands dismissed.

¶47

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶48

HDK

Dr. C B Kavana v. Dr.G. Sagar Hangaragi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. C B Kavana v. Dr.G. Sagar Hangaragi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt J Shaila Vs Smt Nirmala

Smt K R Satyavathi Vs M/S Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

Sri. Chandrashekhara, Vs Smt. H.V. Padma

Smt. Bhanmathi Vs Smt. Shwetha. S

Shivamurthy Vs Mahadevamma

Sri S.Venkataramana Reddy Vs B.Srinivasa Murthy