Dismissed¶32

Sri. Srinivas Baburao v. Sri. Bharat K K

Karnataka HC6 Mar 2025CRL.RP/1128/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; CRL.RP No. 1128 of 2022; Justice J.M.Khazi; dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation; conditional order 21.02.2025; S.397 r/w S.401 Cr.P.C; 438 BNSS; challenge to Crl.A.No.2464/2018 judgment dated 16.05.2022 (LIX Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, CCH-60) confirming C.C.No.21480/2016 judgment dated 27.10.2018 (VI Addl. Small Causes Judge & XXXI ACMM, Bengaluru); petitioner Srinivas Baburao; respondent Bharat K.K; advocates Shamir.A.Naik (absent) and Charan Kumar K V; decided 06.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation for the petitioner in either session and the petitioner appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matter despite the conditional order of 21.02.2025, the petition (termed 'appeal' in the operative line) is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶32

Sri. Srinivas Baburao Vs Sri. Bharat K K — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:9582 CRL.RP No. 1128 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1128 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS))

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. SRINIVAS BABURAO S/O BABURAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.75, 7^TH MAIN ROAD, TATA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 092

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.SHAMIR.A.NAIK, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SRI. BHARAT K.K S/O KRISHNAIAH.K.C AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OFFICE AT: ASSISTANT MANAGER SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD TOWER-C 63/3B, WHITEFIELD ASHRAM ROAD, KANNAMANGALA POST BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, GORVIGERE VILLAGE HOSKOTE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 067 PHONE NO:080 45540000

¶14

ALSO R/AT NO.195/15, 2^ND CROSS, 2^ND MAIN, NANJAPPA LAYOUT, ADUGODI, BENGALURU-560032.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. CHARAN KUMAR K V, ADVOCATE)

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:9582 CRL.RP No. 1128 of 2022

¶19

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W SECTION 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A.NO.2464/2018 DATED: 16.05.2022 PASSED BY THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-60, BENGALURU CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE VI ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXXI ACMM, BENGALURU DATED: 27.10.2018 IN C.C.NO.21480/2016.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

No representation for petitioner.

¶24

No representation for petitioner in the afternoon session also.

¶25

Learned counsel for respondent is present.

¶26

On 21.02.2025, a conditional order was passed to

¶27

the effect that if learned counsel for the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶28

¶29

NC: 2025:KHC:9582 CRL.RP No. 1128 of 2022

¶30

It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting

¶31

the appeal.

¶32

Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶33

Sd/(J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE

¶34