Dismissed¶22

Sri. M. K. Mahalinga Naik v. Sri. K. C. Umesh

Karnataka HC5 Mar 2025CRL.RP/1293/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru; CRL.RP No. 1293 of 2016; NC: 2025:KHC:9404; Justice J.M.Khazi; decided 05.03.2025; revision under S.397/401 CrPC; challenge to S.138 NI Act conviction (C.C.No.38096/2011, XVI ACMM) and appeal judgment (Crl.A.No.331/2015); dismissed for non-prosecution; counsel absent since 02.01.2024; petitioner untraceable at recorded address for four years; no relief granted; no case law discussed.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner appears not interested in prosecuting the petition; therefore the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶22

Sri. M. K. Mahalinga Naik Vs Sri. K. C. Umesh — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:9404 CRL.RP No. 1293 of 2016

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1293 OF 2016 (-)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI. M. K. MAHALINGA NAIK AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE KEMPAIAH, R/AT NO.10/1, A TYPE KPWD QUARTERS, JEEVANBHEEMANAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 025.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. NAGESH S., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by VEDAVATHI A K Location: High Court Of Karnatka

¶12

SRI. K. C. UMESH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O. G. V. CHINNASOMAIAH, R/AT NO.212, I FLOOR, III B CROSS, 4^TH BLOCK, 5^TH MAIN, BSK 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085.

¶13

(BY SRI. K. ABHINAV ANAND, ADVOCATE)

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED:05.08.2016 PASSED BY LXVI ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND S.J., BANGALORE IN CRL.A.NO.331/2015 AND THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION DATED:04.02.2015 PASSED BY THE XVI ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.38096/2011 FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SEC.138 OF N.I ACT, AND ACQUIT THE PETR./ACCUSED BY DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.38906/2011.

¶16

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶17

¶18

NC: 2025:KHC:9404 CRL.RP No. 1293 of 2016

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

As the learned counsel was appearing for the petitioner is not represent him from 02.01.2024, court notices have been sent to the petitioner. It is returned with an endorsement that since four years the petitioner is not residing in the said address and at present one Sri.Gundappa M.B, is residing in the said address and before him Smt.Radhika B.M. and Sri Shantha Kumar were residing in the said address.

¶22

It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

¶23

Sd/(J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE

¶24

SRK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2 CT:SK

Sri. M. K. Mahalinga Naik v. Sri. K. C. Umesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. M. K. Mahalinga Naik v. Sri. K. C. Umesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Syed Yousuf and Ors. Vs Mr. Syed Tajuddin

Shankar Vs Ramsing and Anr.

Shanker S/O Late Manik Kaplapur Since Deceased by His Lrs 1) Sharanamma and Ors. Vs Nagamma and Ors.

Smt. Y. R. Susheela Vs Sri. S. Murali

Sri B Rahul Vs Sri S Manjunatha Babu

Sri B Rahul Vs Sri S L Govindaraju