Dismissed¶42

Sadashiva v. State of Karnataka by

Karnataka HC23 Aug 2025CRL.A/965/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; CRL.A No. 965 of 2021; decided 23.08.2025 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Venkatesh Naik T (oral judgment). Appellant Sadashiva s/o Basappa vs State of Karnataka (R.T. Nagar Police Station) and others. Appeal under Section 14(A)(2) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against bail granted on 21.08.2020 by LXX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-71) in Crl. Misc. No.3943 of 2020 arising out of Crime No.143 of 2020, R.T. Nagar P.S.; offences: Section 506 read with Section 34 I.P.C.; Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) SC/ST (POA) Act. Counsel: Kumara K.G. (appellant); Vinay Mahadevaiah, HCGP (R-1); Suhaib Fazeel Madar (R-2 to R-7). Withdrawal memo filed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn as infructuous; no merits decided; no precedents engaged.

Sadashiva Vs State of Karnataka by — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:33129 CRL.A No. 965 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶7

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.965 OF 2021

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SADASHIVA S/O. BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT GAJANANA SEVA MANDALI TRUST (R) NO.3, HMT LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR BENGALURU-560 032.

¶10

…APPELLANT

¶11

(BY SRI KUMARA K.G., ADVOCATE) AND:

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY R.T. NAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING-01.

¶13

Digitally signed by MOUNESHWARAPPA NAGARATHNA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

RAMAMURTHY N. S/O. B. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.12/1-1 3RD MAIN, KHM BLOCK GANGANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 032.

¶15

K.N. RAMESHA S/O. B. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.7, NARAYANAPPA BLOCK 6TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND BLOCK GANGANAGAR, R.T. NAGAR BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 032.

¶16

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:33129 CRL.A No. 965 of 2021

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

K. VISHWANATH S/O. H. KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.106 MUNIRAMANNA BLOCK 3RD MAIN, 3RD CROSS GANGANAGAR R.T. NAGAR, BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 032.

¶19

VEERISETTY BHASKAR S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22 1ST CROSS, VENKATSWAMAPPA LAYOUT CHAMUNDI NAGAR R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 032.

¶20

VEERISETTY SEKHAR S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22 1ST CROSS, VENKATSWAMAPPA LAYOUT CHAMUNDI NAGAR R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 032.

¶21

VEERISETTY MURALI S/O. SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.22 1ST CROSS, VENKATSWAMAPPA LAYOUT CHAMUNDI NAGAR R.T. NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560 032.

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, H.C.G.P., FOR R-1, AND

¶24

SRI SUHAIB FAZEEL MADAR, ADVOCATE, FOR R-2 TO R-7)

¶25

¶26

¶27

NC: 2025:KHC:33129 CRL.A No. 965 of 2021

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14(A)(2) OF THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.08.2020 PASSED BY THE LXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-71) IN CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO.3943 OF 2020, WHICH IS ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.143 OF 2020 OF THE RESPONDENTR.T. NAGAR POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 506 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF THE I.P.C. AND SECTIONS 3(1)(r) AND 3(1)(s) OF THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989, BY GRANTING BAIL TO RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 7/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 6.

¶30

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

¶31

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶32

Sri Kumara K.G., learned counsel for the appellant, is physically present and files a memo for withdrawal of the appeal.

¶33

The contents of the memo read as under:

¶34

"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶35

The Appellant submits as follows:

¶36

The Advocate for Appellant prays before this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the Appeal as become infructuous and memo may kindly be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity."

¶37