Dismissed¶33

Sri Amith @ Amith Kumar v. State by Women Police Tumakuru

Karnataka HC16 Sept 2025CRL.P/9445/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court CRL.P No. 9445 of 2025 (16-09-2025), Mohammad Nawaz J.: regular bail petition under S.439 Cr.PC / S.483 BNSS in Spl.C.No.466/2024, Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTSC-1) Tumakuru, arising from CR.No.55/2024 Women Police Station; offences under Ss.363, 376, 506 IPC, Ss.4 and 6 POCSO Act 2012, S.9 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act; petition dismissed as withdrawn via counsel's memo with liberty sought; Registry to return certified copies of FIR/complaint/charge sheet; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought in counsel's memo; Registry directed to return the certified copies of the documents furnished along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioner, retaining photocopies. ¶33

Sri Amith @ Amith Kumar Vs State by Women… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

NC: 2025:KHC:36805 CRL.P No. 9445 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9445 OF 2025

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. AMITH @ AMITH KUMAR S/O SRINIVAS, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT JAKKASANDRA COLONY, ARISHINAGUNTE POST, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL -562 123.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. AJAY N., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

STATE BY WOMEN POLICE, TUMAKURU REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶16

VIJAYA KUMARI W/O NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT 2^ND CROSS, SLN NAGARA, KYTHSANDRA, TUMUKURU TOWN, TUMUKURU - 572 104.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. R. RANGASWAMY, HCGP)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2025:KHC:36805 CRL.P No. 9445 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL IN SPL.C.NO.466/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (FTSC-1), TUMAKURU, ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.55/2024 FILED BY THE WOMEN POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 363, 376 AND 506 OF THE IPC, SECTIONS 4 AND 6 OF THE POCSO ACT, 2012 AND SECTION 9 OF THE PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT.

¶23

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo

¶27

for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶28

The undersigned counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that, in view of the change in circumstances that have subsequently arisen, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate bail application before the Trial Court. The petitioner further prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Registry to return the certified copies of the FIR, Complaint, and Charge Sheet, so that the same may be produced and taken on record before the Trial Court, in the interest of justice.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2025:KHC:36805 CRL.P No. 9445 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

The memo is placed on record.

¶33

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty sought.

¶34

Registry is directed to return the certified copies of the documents furnished along with the petition to the learned counsel for petitioner, receiving the photo copies

¶35

of the same.

¶36

Sd/(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)

¶37

JUDGE

¶38

DKB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Sri Amith @ Amith Kumar v. State by Women Police Tumakuru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Amith @ Amith Kumar v. State by Women Police Tumakuru

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajashekhar N H Vs the State of Karnataka

Balakrishna @ Balu Vs State of Karnataka

Mr.Sayad Bilal Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Harish S M Vs the State of Karnataka

Sheetal Sidram Sollapure Vs State by Cen Police

Mr Girisha B P Vs State by