K Venkateshulu v. Satyendrakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, CRL.A No. 486 of 2015, decided 13.02.2025 by Shivashankar AmaranNavar, J. Appeal under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against acquittal under Section 138 of the N.I. Act recorded by the Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Chitradurga in Crl.A.71/2010 (order dated 18.2.2014); appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellant's counsel was repeatedly absent (03.04.2024, 20.06.2024, 04.02.2025 and on the final-hearing date) notwithstanding a last-chance adjournment. Search terms: dismissal for non-prosecution; Section 378(4) Cr.P.C.; Section 138 N.I. Act acquittal appeal; counsel absent; last chance adjournment; Chitradurga.
What did the court decide?
Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted, learned counsel for the appellant was not present to argue the matter and the appellant appeared not interested in prosecuting the appeal.