Dismissed¶26

G. T. Ramaswamy v. Sri. M. N. Mahesh

Karnataka HC12 Feb 2025CRL.A/1864/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023; Justice Shivashankar Amaranavar; decided 12-02-2025; criminal appeal under S. 378(4) Cr.P.C.; appeal dismissed for non-compliance of office objections; counsel for appellants absent, no representation; appeal listed fourth time for office objections; impugned judgment dated 05.11.2019 in Crl.A.No.179/2018 by III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan; conviction order in C.C.No.332/2013 by Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Belur sought to be upheld; respondent M. N. Mahesh; prayer to direct payment of double the cheque amount (no figure stated); no merits adjudicated; no precedents cited; no costs or quantum awarded.

What did the court decide?

The learned counsel for the appellants was absent and there was no representation on the appellants' side. ¶21

G. T. Ramaswamy Vs Sri. M. N. Mahesh — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶6

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1864 OF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

G.T. RAMASWAMY SINCE DIED BY HIS LRs

¶9

1(A) SMT. SUSHEELA W/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24^TH CROSS 28^TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2^ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102

¶10

Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

1(B). MRS. PRATHIBHA R W/O LATE DINESH KUMAR L.V D/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24^TH CROSS 28^TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2^ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102

¶12

1(C). MR. PRATHAP G.R S/O LATE RAMASWAMY G.T AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 320 FLAT NO. 401, 24^TH CROSS 28^TH MAIN HSR LAYOUT 2^ND SECTOR, BANGALORE - 560 102 …APPELLANTS

¶13

(BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE -[ABSENT]

¶14

2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023

¶15

AND:

¶16

SRI. M. N. MAHESH S/O M.V. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 52 YARS R/AT BELAGODU VILLAGE AND HOBLI SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 127

¶17

…RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2019 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN IN CRL.A.NO.179/2018 CONSEQUENTLY UPHOLD THE CONVICTION ORDER PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., BELUR IN C.C.NO.332/2013 AND BE PLEASED TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PAY THE DOUBLE OF THE CHEQUE AMOUNT.

¶18

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

¶20

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. There is no representation on the appellants’ side.

¶22

The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fourth time. Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied. It appears that the appellants are not interested in

¶23

NC: 2025:KHC:6185 CRL.A No. 1864 of 2023

¶24

¶25

prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed

¶26

for non compliance of office objections.

¶27

Sd/(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE

¶28

GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12