Dismissed¶¶39

Govind v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC11 Jun 2025CRL.P/200549/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Kalaburagi; CRL.P 200549/2025; quashing of FIR sought under S.482 Cr.P.C. (old)/S.528 BNSS; FIR Crime No.132/2024, Kalakeri Police Station, Vijayapura; offence under S.108 BNS; pending before Addl. Civil Judge & JMFC Sindagi; petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; liberty reserved to re-approach after charge-sheet; no ruling on merits; judge V. Srishananda; dated 11-06-2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition, with liberty to approach the Hon'ble Court after filing of the charge-sheet; no quashing of the FIR or complaint was granted. ¶¶39

Govind Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3038 CRL.P No. 200549 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶4

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200549/2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

GOVIND S/O KALIDAS DEVAKAR, AGE:35 YEARS, OCC: POLICE DEPT.

¶11

KRISHNAPPA @ KRISHNA S/O LAXMAN DEVAKAR, AGE:53 YEARS, OCC: AGRI.

¶12

Digitally signed by SUMITRA SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

YALLAVVA @ MAHADEVI W/O KRISHNA DEVAKAR, AGE:51 YEARS, OCC: H.H. WORK.

¶14

ANASUYA W/O KRISHNA DEVAKAR, AGE:51 YEARS, OCC: H.H. WORK,

¶15

PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 4 ARE ALL R/O. NAGTHAN, TQ.INDI DIST. VIJAYAPURA-586112.

¶16

SHRISHAIL S/O RAMANNA DEVAKAR, AGE:40 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O. HYDRABAD - 500001 (T.S.).

¶17

2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3038 CRL.P No. 200549 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

PARVATI W/O KALIDAS DEVAKAR, AGE:49 YEARS, OCC: H. H. WORK, R/O. NAGTHAN, TQ. INDI, DIST.VIJAYAPURA-586112.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI YASHAS S. DIKSHIT, ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY KALAKERI POLICE STATION, DIST.VIJAYAPURA, REP BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH, KALABURAGI.

¶24

INDIRABAI W/O SURESH DODDAMANI, AGE:55 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O. HONNALLI, TQ.SINDAGI, DIST.VIJAYAPURA-586128.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI JAMADAR SHAHABUDDIN, HCGP, FOR R1 SRI SUDHEER KULKARNI, ADVOCATE, FOR R2)

¶27

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C.(OLD)U/SEC 528 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO, QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT AGAINST ALL THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IN CRIMENO.132/2024 OF KALAKERI POLICE STATION, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC SINDAGI, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC 108 OF BNS.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

¶30

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:3038 CRL.P No. 200549 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA)

¶34

After addressing argument at length, learned

¶35

counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.

¶36

The memo reads as under:

¶37

“The counsel for the petitioner most humbly seeks permission of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Hon’ble Court after filing of charge-sheet.

¶38

Hence this memo.”

¶39

3. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

¶40

Sd/(V. SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶41

SBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40

Govind v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govind v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mamita W/O Shivappa Jamadar Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Vinod Channannavar and Ors. Vs State of Karnataka

Basavaraj Pujary Vs the State of Karnataka and Anr.

Veerashetty Vs the State of Karnataka

Iranna Vs the State of Karnataka

Gundappa Vs the State of Karnataka