Dismissed¶34

Veerashetty v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC11 Jun 2025CRL.P/200051/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing petition (CRL.P No. 200051 of 2024) challenging proceedings in C.C No.01/2023 under Section 193 IPC before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bidar; dismissal as withdrawn on memo filed by counsel after arguments; liberty granted and all available defences kept open in the pending trial. Justice V Srishananda, High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, dated 11-06-2025; NC: 2025:KHC-K:3031.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn on the counsel's memo, with liberty as prayed for; all available defences kept open to be canvassed in the pending trial in C.C No.01/2023. ¶34

Veerashetty Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3031 CRL.P No. 200051 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶5

KALABURAGI BENCH

¶6

DATED THIS THE 11^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200051 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

VEERASHETTY S/O PRABUSHETTY KUNCHAGE, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O KUNCHAGE LAYOUT, MAMANKERI, BIDAR-585401.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI HANMANTHRAYA SINDOL, ADVOCATE)

¶14

Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

AND:

¶16

THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BIDAR, BIDAR-585401.

¶17

…RESPONDENT

¶18

(BY SRI RAVI B. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶19

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C NO.01/2023 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 193 OF IPC,

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC-K:3031 CRL.P No. 200051 of 2024

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BIDAR VIDE ANNEXURE-C.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)

¶28

After addressing the arguments at length, learned

¶29

counsel Sri Hanmanthraya Sindol for the petitioner files a

¶30

memo.

¶31

2. Memo reads as under:

¶32

“In the above case, the petitioner does not wanted to proceed with the case. Hence the petition of the petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw the petition, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶33