Allowed

Smt Maheswhwari v. Basayya

Karnataka HC7 Nov 2025CP/200027/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband filed a writ petition seeking transfer of divorce proceedings he initiated at the Kalaburagi Family Court to the Family Court at Yadgir, where the wife had already filed her own matrimonial case. The court noted the distance between the towns and the inconvenience to the wife, allowed consolidation at Yadgir.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in M.C. No. 5/2024, Family Court, Kalaburagi, transferred to the Family Court at Yadgir for disposal along with the wife's case there.

Smt Maheswhwari Vs Basayya — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2025)

��

��

��

��

��^�� !��

��

��"��!��#��!��!��

�� $��%

��&��

�� !"��

#��

$��%�� &�

��

Digitally signed by SACHIN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

�� !�� '�� !"��

#��

$��&�

��%��($�&$�&�� %��%��)!��!�(� ��%����'��%�� '����'��%�� %��'�� %�'��

��

��

��%��

�� +��'��

��

$��+��'��&

�,-�./-0-12�.-232341�30�56�2,-�738-�0--931:�;1�4/<-/� 24�2/;108-/�./4=--<31:0�84/�<3004>?2341�48�@;//3;:-�31� ��4�)!��!�(�31323;2-<�56�2,-�/-0.41<-12�A�,?05;1<�� .-1<31:�41�2,-�83>-�48�2,-��/31=3.;>�'?<:-��%;@3>6��4?/2�� 3B;6;.?/�24�2,-��4?/2�48��<<32341;>��/31=3.;>�'?<:-��%;@3>6� �4?/2��;>;5?/;:3��

¶28

�� ,-�@;//3;:-�5-27--1�2,-�.;/23-0�30�142�31� <30.?2-��=,3><�56�1;@-��;C;16;�54/1�24�2,-�.-232341-/� ;1<�2,-�/-0.41<-12�30�;>04�142�31�<30.?2-��,-/-�;..-;/0� 24�5-�=-/2;31�8;@3>6�<30=4/<�5-27--1�2,-�.-232341-/�A�738-� ;1<�2,-�/-0.41<-12�A�,?05;1<��1�8?/2,-/;1=-�24�7,3=,�� .-232341-/A738-� ,;0� 31323;2-<� ./4=--<31:0� ?1<-/�� -=2341��48��/3@31;>��/4=-<?/-��4<-��)D"�0--931:� @;312-1;1=-�31��/>��30=��4�(��!��41�2,-�83>-�48�2,-�

��

��

�/31=3.;>�'?<:-��%;@3>6��4?/2��;>;5?/;:3�;1<�0;@-�,;0� 5--1�;>>47-<�;1<�2,-/-;82-/�83>-<�/-=4C-/6�./4=--<31:0�31� �/>��30=��4�"��!�(�7,3=,�30�.-1<31:�5-84/-�2,-��4?/2�48� �<<32341;>�'?<:-��%;@3>6��4?/2��;>;5?/;:3��

¶33

"� �,-1�2,31:0�0244<�2,?0��/-0.41<-12�A�,?05;1<� ,;0�31323;2-<�2,-�;84/-0;3<�./4=--<31:0�31��4�)!��!�(� ?1<-/��-=2341��" �$3;&$35&�48�2,-��31<?��;//3;:-��=2��)�� 0--931:�/->3-8�48�<3004>?2341�48�2,-�@;//3;:-�5-27--1� .-232341-/�;1<�2,-�/-0.41<-12�5-84/-�2,-��/31=3.;>�'?<:-�� %;@3>6��4?/2��3B;6;.?/��2�30�2,30�.-232341�7,3=,�30�04?:,2� 24�5-�2/;108-//-<�;1<�.>;=-<�5-84/-�2,-��<<32341;>��/31=3.;>�

¶34

'?<:-��%;@3>6��4?/2��;>;5?/;:3��

¶35

(� �41-�;..-;/0�84/�2,-�/-0.41<-12��

¶36

�� ,-� <302;1=-� 5-27--1� �3B;6;.?/;� ;1<�

¶37

�;>;5?/;:3�30�0;3<�24�5-��D!�93>4@-2-/0��-232341-/ 738-�;1<� 2,-�@314/�=,3><�;/-�/-03<31:�732,31�2,-�B?/30<3=2341�48�2,-� %;@3>6� �4?/2�� ;>;5?/;:3�� ,4?:,� 2,-� 4/<-/0� 84/� @;312-1;1=-�,;C-�5--1�.;00-<�?1<-/��-=2341��/��

��

��

32�30�0?5@322-<�2,;2�2,-�/-0.41<-12�A�,?05;1<�30�142� =4@.>631:�2,-�0;3<�4/<-/��31=-�2,-�.-232341-/�A�738-�30� =?//-12>6�02;2-<�24�5-�/-03<31:�732,�,-/�=,3><�;2��;>;5?/;:3�� 0,-�,;C31:�31323;2-<�2,-�./4=--<31:0�./34/�24�/-0.41<-12� 31323;231:� 2,-� ./4=--<31:0� 31� ��4�)!��!�(� ;1<� =4103<-/31:�2,-�<302;1=-�5-31:��D!�93>4@-2-/0��2,30��4?/2� 30�48�2,-�=4103<-/-<�C3-7�2,;2�2,-�.-232341�<-0-/C-0�24�5-� ;>>47-<��==4/<31:>6��2,-�84>>4731:��

¶42

��

¶43

$3& �,-�.-232341�30�� $33& �,-� ./4=--<31:0� 31� ��4�)!��!�(� .-1<31:�5-84/-�2,-��4?/2�48�2,-��/31=3.;>� '?<:-�� %;@3>6� �4?/2�� 3B;6;.?/� 5-� 732,</;71�;1<�73>>�5-�./-0-12-<�5-84/-�2,-� �4?/2�48�2,-��<<32341;>��/31=3.;>�'?<:-�� %;@3>6��4?/2��;>;5?/;:3��

¶44

�'(�� $!��!��%� #��

¶45

��302��4��>��4��D� ��

Smt Maheswhwari v. Basayya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Maheswhwari v. Basayya

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandit Rao S/O Sidramappa Mali Patil Vs Kumari Preethi D/O Pandith Rao Anr.

Ravigouda S/O Bhimangouda Patil Anr. Vs Hanamanthraya S/O Sidramappa Deshpande Anr.

Suresh S/O Kashinath Vs Kashinath S/O Sidram Kannale and Ors.

Channamma W/O Doddappa Honamatti Vs Hullappa S/O. Basappa Honamatti and Ors.

Gurupadayya S/O Chanabasayya Hireamth Vs Basayya S/O Basayya Hiremath and Ors.

Dr. Ambika S Patil Vs the State of Karnataka