Disposed¶31

Ms Priyanka C v. Union Bank of India

Karnataka HC29 Oct 2025COMAP/261/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; COMAP No. 261/2024 (Commercial Appeal, S. 96 CPC); appellants Priyanka C., Chikkanna V., Lakshmi Nagaraja (advocate Madhu S. B.) v. Union Bank of India (erstwhile Corporation Bank), Basavanagudi Branch; challenges judgment/decree dated 29/11/2023 of LXXXVIII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (Exclusive Commercial Court), Bangalore (CCH 89) in COM. OS 7234/2019; oral order 29.10.2025 per Vijaykumar A. Patil, J. (with Anu Sivaraman, J.) gave two weeks to clear office objections; objections not complied with; appeal rejected without adjudication of merits; no citations, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks' time was granted to comply with office objections; failing which the appeal shall stand rejected without reference to the Bench. ¶28

Ms Priyanka C Vs Union Bank of India — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

AND

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2024 (MON)

¶6

BETWEEN

¶7

1 . MS. PRIYANKA C., D/O CHIKKANNA V., AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶8

2 . SRI CHIKKANNA V., S/O LATE VENKATARAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶9

APPELLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 ARE R/AT NO. 52/53, SAI RAM NILAYA, 3^RD CROSS, PATTANAGERE MAIN ROAD, R. R. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 098.

¶10

3 . SMT. LAKSHMI NAGARAJA, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, R/AT NO. 95, SRINIVAS NILAYA,

…2

COMAP NO.261/2024

VINAYAKA NAGAR, PWD COLONY, KOLAR CITY, KOLAR DISTRICT - 560 037.

¶15

...APPELLANT/S

¶16

(By Sri/Smt.: MADHU S. B., ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND

¶18

UNION BANK OF INDIA, (ERSTWHILE CORPORATION BANK), BASAVANAGUDI BRANCH, NO 6, GANDHI BAZAR, BASAVANAGUDI,

¶19

BANGALORE - 560 004, WORKING AS CHIEF MANAGER, SMT. K. SUREKHAKUMARI, W/O SURESH V. HEDGE, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, e mail id [email protected] IFSC CODE: CORP0000069. …RESPONDENT/S

¶20

The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal under section 96 of code of civil procedure Praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29/11/2023 passed by the LXXXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Exclusive Commercial Court), Bangalore (CCH 89) in COM. OS No. 7234/2019 (ANNEXURE-A) and also pass suitable orders if this Honorable court may deems fit, in the interest of justice and equity.

…3

COMAP NO.261/2024

This Commercial Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the

¶25

Court made the following order.

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)

¶28

Finally, two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand rejected without reference to the Bench.

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 29.10.2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby rejected.

¶32

COPY

¶33

Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶34

T By : SR R By : VS C By : GS