Disposed¶60

Jbf Rak Llc v. Ganapathy Industries

Karnataka HC29 Oct 2025COMAP/206/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

COMAP NO.206/2024; Commercial Appeal No. 206 of 2024; High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; JBF RAK LLC; JBF BAHRAIN W.L.L.; Sunil Shukla legal representative; GANAPATHY INDUSTRIES; Yeshwanthpur Bangalore; Section 13(1A) Commercial Courts Act; Order XLIII Rule 1(a) CPC; Commercial Original Suit No. 749 of 2023; impugned order dated 6th January 2024; LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-84) Commercial Court Bangalore; office objections not complied; appeal rejected without reference to Bench; restraint on disposal of goods; Court Receiver; Anu Sivaraman; Vijaykumar A. Patil; decided 29.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks' time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal would stand rejected without reference to the Bench. ¶54-56

Jbf Rak Llc Vs Ganapathy Industries — Karnataka HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025

¶2

BEFORE

¶3

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN

¶4

AND

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶6

COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 206 OF 2024

¶7

BETWEEN

¶8

JBF RAK LLC,

¶9

OFFICE AT: POST BOX NO. 6574,

¶10

AL JAZEERA, AL HAMRA,

¶11

RAS AI KHAIMAH,

¶12

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES,

¶13

REPRESENTED BY IT’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE:

¶14

SRI SUNIL SHUKLA,

¶15

SON OF SRI TRIBHUVANNATH SHUKLA,

¶16

AGED 54 YEARS,

¶17

RESIDING AT: NO A-401, JP DECKS,

¶18

NEXT TO DINDOSHI COURT,

¶19

GENERAL A. K. VAIDYA MARG,

¶20

MALAD EAST,

¶21

MUMBAI – 400 097.

¶22

JBF BAHRAIN W.L.L., OFFICE AT: BLDG 461, ROAD 1508,

…2

COMAP NO.206/2024

BLOCK 115, ALHIDD, B.L.L.P.,

¶27

SALMAN IND CITY, BAHRAIN, REPRESENTED BY IT’S LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE; SRI SUNIL SHUKLA, SON OF SRI TRIBHUVANNATH SHUKLA, AGED 54 YEARS,

¶28

RESIDING AT: A-401, JP DECKS, NEXT TO DINDOSHI COURT, GENERAL A. K. VAIDYA MARG, MALAD EAST, MUMBAI - 400 097.

¶29

...APPELLANT/S

¶30

(By Sri/Smt. : GAURAV SHUKLA, SOM SINHA, HEMANT SHUKLA, CHETAN TAYAL AND IMRAN G., ADVOCATES)

¶31

AND

¶32

GANAPATHY INDUSTRIES,

¶33

HAVING IT’S OFFICE AT: FACTORY NO. 31, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB, YESHWANTHPUR, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA,

¶34

INDIA – 560 022. …RESPONDENT/S

¶35

The Advocate for the appellant has filed the above COMAP / Commercial Appeal Under Section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts Act read with Order XLIII Rule 1 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

¶36

…3

¶37

3 COMAP NO.206/2024

¶38

a. That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the Impugned Order dated 6th January, 2024 passed by the Hon'ble LXXXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-84), Commercial Court at Bangalore in Commercial Original Suit No. 749 of 2023 (Exhibit - )

¶39

b. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Appeal, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain the Respondent from disposing off the good which were admitted delivered to them and are in admitted possession of the Respondent.

¶40

IN ALTERNATIVE:-

¶41

c. Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Appeal, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint Court Receiver to take inventory of the goods in possession of the Respondent and also take possession of the goods which were admittedly delivered to

¶42

them by the Appellants;

¶43

d. For ad-interim and interim reliefs in terms of prayer clause b to c,

¶44

e. For costs,

¶45

f. For such other and further reliefs as the facts of this case may warrant;

¶46

…4

¶47

¶48