Sri. Janakiraman S Vs Smt. Shridurgha Janakiraman — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2025)

Sri. Janakiraman S Vs Smt. Shridurgha Janakiraman — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2025)

1 -

NC: 2025:KHC:22509-DB CCC No.710/2017 C/W CCC No.826/2021 CCC No.827/2021

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 710 OF 2017

C/W

CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 826 OF 2021, CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 827 OF 2021

IN CCC No. 710/2017

BETWEEN:

SRI. JANAKIRAMAN S S/O SRINIVASAN S., AGED 39 YEARS, FLAT NO.14/D1, KRISHNANAGAR APPTS, ANNASANDRAPALAYA, HAL POST, BENGALURU - 560 017. …COMPLAINANT

Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka

(BY SRI. P.B. APPAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. SHRIDURGHA JANAKIRAMAN AGED 41 YEARS, NO.A-124, SLS SPELDOR, DEVERABISANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI RING ROAD, BELANDUR P.O., BENGALURU - 560 103.

ALSO AT

CISCO SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD., SEZ UNIT, CESSNA BUSINESS PARK, KADUBEESANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI RING ROAD, BELANDUR POST, BANGALORE - 560 103. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. N. VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

2 -

NC: 2025:KHC:22509-DB CCC No.710/2017 C/W CCC No.826/2021 CCC No.827/2021

HC-KAR

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HER SUITABLY FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2016 IN EX.PETN.204/2016 IN PURSUANCE OF THE ORDER DATED 11.11.2015 IN G&WC 68/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE.

IN CCC NO. 826/2021

BETWEEN:

SRI. JANAKIRAMAN S., S/O SRINIVASAN S., AGED 43 YEARS, 3^RD FLOOR, NO.8, HIMAGIRI SILICON CITY LAYOUT, DODDATHOGUR CROSS, NEELADRI ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE I, BENGALURU-560100. ...COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. P.B. APPAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. SRIDURGHA JANAKIRAMAN AGED 45 YEARS, NO.A-124, SLS SPELDOR, DEVERABISANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI RING ROAD, BELANDUR P.O., BENGALURU-560103. ...ACCUSED

(BY SRI. N.VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HER SUITABLY FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 29.10.2020 IN EX 100/2020 IN PURSUANCE TO THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.01.2020 IN G AND WC 68/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU BY NOT HANDING OVER CHILD TO COMPLAINANT ON 24.10.2020 WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY FOR DASARA VACATIONS 2020.

IN CCC NO. 827/2021

BETWEEN:

SRI. JANAKIRAMAN S S/O SRINIVASAN S,

3 -

NC: 2025:KHC:22509-DB CCC No.710/2017 C/W CCC No.826/2021 CCC No.827/2021

HC-KAR

AGED 43 YEARS, 3^RD FLOOR, NO.8, HIMAGIRI SILICON CITY LAYOUT, DODDATHOGUR CROSS, NEELADRI ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE 1, BANGALURU-560100. ...COMPLAINANT

(BY SRI. P.B. APPAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SMT. SRIDURGHA JANAKIRAMAN AGED 45 YEARS, NO.A-124, SLS SPELDOR, DEVERABISANAHALLI, MARATHAHALLI RING ROAD, BELANDUR P.O., BENGALURU-560013. ...ACCUSED

(BY SRI. N.VASANTH KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT AND ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND PUNISH HER SUITABLY FOR VIOLATING THE JUDGMENT DATED 16.01.2020 IN G&WC 68/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE, BY NOT HANDING OVER THE CHILD TO COMPLAINANT ON 27.03.2021 WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY FOR SUMMER VACATIONS 2021, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)

Accused and learned counsel for both the parties are

present. Learned counsel for respondent/accused submits

compliance affidavit.

4 - NC: 2025:KHC:22509-DB CCC No.710/2017 C/W CCC No.826/2021 CCC No.827/2021

HC-KAR

In the compliance affidavit, the accused has stated that she has already tendered an unconditional apology and she undertakes to comply the visitation orders passed by the Family Court which is the subject matter of these complaints.

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the undertaking may be accepted.

Having regard to the relationship between the parties, considering the unconditional apology tendered by respondent No.1 and also undertaking given by the accused to comply visitation order passed by the Family Court, these proceedings are dropped.

Sd/(K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE

Sd/(P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE

HJ

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16