Dr. Julian Sundersingh v. Rt. Rev. Dr. Prasana Kumar Samuel
Civil contempt – disobedience of interim injunction
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:744-DB. Karnataka High Court (DB; order per K. Somashekar J., with Venkatesh Naik T J.), 9-1-2025, CCC No. 34 of 2023 c/w CCC No. 567 of 2022 and CCC No. 64 of 2023. Holds that disobedience of an interim injunction order that has not attained finality does not amount to contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Ss. 10, 12 r/w Art. 215 Constitution); the indicated statutory course for breach of such an order is Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC before the trial Court. Context: complaints by members of the St. John Church pastorate committee against the Bishop, Karnataka Central Diocese CSI, and others over the interim injunction dated 21-4-2022 in O.S. No.1373 of 2022; complainants' earlier Order XXXIX Rule 2A petition (M.P. No.165 of 2024) was dismissed as withdrawn on 9-7-2024; coordinate Bench precedents CCC No.1237 of 2022 and CCC No.703 of 2024 followed; Welset Engineers v. Vikas Auto Industries (2015) 10 SCC 609 cited by complainants on maintainability. Contempt proceedings dropped, liberty reserved, pending applications dismissed. Relevant to arguments on maintainability of contempt proceedings for breach of interlocutory injunctions and election of the Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC remedy.