Disposed¶29

Smt Dakshayani v. Sri G T Dinesh Kumar

Karnataka HC17 Jun 2025CCC/1069/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Sections 11, 12; Article 215 Constitution of India; civil contempt; disobedience of writ court directions; WP Nos. 11571/2020 order dated 11.7.2022; Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) Commissioner; alternate site allotment letter 22.11.2024; sale deed to legal heir/daughter; death of complainant 14.12.2022; withdrawal memo; compliance accepted; contempt proceedings dropped; Karnataka High Court DB; CCC No. 1069/2022; decision dated 17 June 2025; K.S. Mudagal J.; P Sree Sudha J.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings dropped without imposing any punishment, upon acceptance of the compliance report (alternate site allotment and execution of sale deed in favour of the complainant's daughter/legal representative) and the withdrawal memo filed by the complainant's counsel. ¶29

Smt Dakshayani Vs Sri G T Dinesh Kumar — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC:20998-DB CCC No. 1069/2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1069/2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT DAKSHAYANI, W/O LATE BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O C.H. 28, BALAKRISHNA RAO ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURAM, MYSORE- 570 005.

¶10

…COMPLAINANT

¶11

(BY SRI. J M ANIL KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

SRI G T DINESH KUMAR, COMMISSIONER, MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JLB ROAD, MYSORE-570 001.

¶14

Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

…ACCUSED

¶16

(BY SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, R/W SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED/DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THIS HONBLE COURT ON 11.7.2022 IN WP NOS.11571/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND DEAL WITH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶18

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL AND HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

¶20

¶21

NC: 2025:KHC:20998-DB CCC No. 1069/2022

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL)

¶25

Affidavit of accused No.2 reporting compliance of the

¶26

order in question is submitted by the counsel for the accused, along with alternate site allotment letter dated 22.11.2024 and the sale deed executed by the accused in the name of legal representative of the complainant.

¶27

The complainant's counsel admits that the complainant passed away on 14.12.2022, alternative site is allotted and sale deed is executed in favour of daughter of complainant. He has filed memo for withdrawal of contempt petition.

¶28

Since order is complied and the delay is explained,

¶29

accepting the same, the proceedings are dropped.

¶30

Sd/(K.S.MUDAGAL) JUDGE

¶31

Sd/(P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE

¶32

AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Smt Dakshayani v. Sri G T Dinesh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Dakshayani v. Sri G T Dinesh Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H R Jayaram Vs Sri. K. Nanjappa

Dr K P Diwakara Shetty Vs Sri.Kurma Rao N

Smt Chandramma Vs Sri Suresh Kumar

A Krishna Setty Vs Umashankar S R

Smt Munilakshmamma Vs Sri Ganapathy Shashtri

Sri H Ananda Kumar Vs Mr Natesh