Disposed¶35

Shivanand S/O Prahlad Anavekar v. K S Hanchinal

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2025CCC/100186/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Dharwad) civil contempt petition CCC 100186/2025 against Sub-Registrar Hubballi (North) for disobeying order dated 26.03.2025 in W.P. No. 101686/2025; compliance reported by complainants' counsel; AGA memo considered; proceedings dropped 19.09.2025 (coram S. Sunil Dutt Yadav and Vijaykumar A. Patil JJ., per Patil J.); statutes: Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Sections 11-12; Article 215, Constitution of India 1950.

What did the court decide?

No punishment imposed; contempt proceedings dropped in view of the confirmed compliance with the order dated 26.03.2025 in W.P. No. 101686/2025. ¶35

Shivanand S/O Prahlad Anavekar Vs K S Hanchinal — Contempt of Court | Karnataka HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12678-DB CCC No. 100186 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

¶7

CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100186/2025 (CIVIL)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SHIVANAND S/O. PRAHLAD ANAVEKAR, AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: GOLDSMITH, R/O. BHASKAR NIVASA, 1^ST CROSS, KILLA, NEAR ISHWAR TEMPLE, HUBBALLI.

¶10

SMT. PARVATI W/O. GOPAL DESAI, AGE: 81 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. VITHOBA GALLI, DURGADBAIL, HUBBALLI.

¶11

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench

¶12

SMT. SAVITA W/O. SHRIKANT PATIL, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BEHIND PRASAD LODGE, MASARI, GADAG.

¶13

VISHWANATH S/O. GOPAL DESAI, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: JOB, R/O. #31, CHITRAKUTA APARTMENT, RANADE COLONY, 2^ND CROSS, HINDAWADA, HUKKERI, BELAGAVI.

¶14

SMT. VASUNDARA W/O. VINAYAKA DESAI, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. 365, 4^TH MAIN ROAD, 2^ND BLOCK, BANASHANKARI, 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU. R/BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER POORVI D/O. VINAYAKA DESAI I.E. COMPLAINANT NO.6.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2025:KHC-D:12678-DB CCC No. 100186 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

POORVI D/O. VINAYAKA DESAI, AFTER MARRIAGE SMT. POORVI W/O. SANTOSH KUMAR, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/O. D. 305, INNOVATIVE PETALA, B.M.A. COLLEGE ROAD, DODMANIKUNDI, BENGALURU.

¶19

SMT. MEDINI W/O. VINAYAK DESAI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE WORK, R/BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER POORVI D/O. VINAYAKA DESAI I.E. COMPLAINANT NO.6.

¶20

…COMPLAINANTS

¶21

(BY SRI. F. V. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

K. S. HANCHINAL, THE SUB-REGISTRAR, HUBBALLI, (NORTH), TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD.

¶24

…ACCUSED

¶25

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY AGA.

¶26

…PROFORMA RESPONDENT

¶27

(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR A1 AND A2)

¶28

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS, ACT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR DELIBERATELY DISOBEYING THE ORDER DATED 26.03.2025 PASSED IN W.P. NO. 101686/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND ETC.

¶29

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶30

3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:12678-DB CCC No. 100186 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL)

¶35

Learned counsel Sri.F.V. Patil appearing for the complainants submit that the order of the learned Single Judge has been complied. Taking note of the same and considering the memo filed by learned Additional Government Advocate, the contempt proceedings are dropped.

¶36

Sd/(S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶37

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE

¶38

RKM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15

Shivanand S/O Prahlad Anavekar v. K S Hanchinal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivanand S/O Prahlad Anavekar v. K S Hanchinal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Saraswati W/O Vasant Madava Hegadekatte Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri.Manjunath S/O Timmanna Hulmani Vs Smt.Laxmi W/O Manjunath Hulamani

Laxmi Nemani Mense Vs Nitin Balawant Hangirgekar

Jayashree W/O Ramesh Keralli Vs the Deputy Commissioner

The State of Karnataka Vs Harijan Yerriswamy S/O Smt Basamma

Saali Mansur Basha Vs the Stae of Karnataka