Sri.H.S.Anushankar v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner challenged orders rejecting his claim to regularise unauthorised occupation of land. The Court observed inordinate delay and lack of documentary evidence establishing cultivation, thereby finding no merit in the petitioner's claim and dismissing the petition.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit due to inordinate delay and failure to produce documentary evidence establishing cultivation of the land.