Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as infructuous because the Family Court had already passed final orders in the main petition before the interim order was challenged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:15679 WP No. 8629 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 8629 OF 2017 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI A.R.KUMUTA RAMAIAH SON OF LATE RAMAKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT OLD NO 592, NEW NO 71/1, YADAVA NILAYA, 1ST FLOOR, NO.2, 3RD MAIN, 9TH CROSS, DIVANARAPALYA, BENGALURU – 560 054 AND ALSO WORKING AS ATTENDER IN EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA VEEDHI, K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI.SHREEDEEP N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
WIFE OF SRI A.R.KUMUTA RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS RESIDING AT AGALAKUPPE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT
SON OF SRI A.R. KUMUTA RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS RESIDING AT AGALAKUPPE VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK
NC: 2024:KHC:15679 WP No. 8629 of 2017
BENGALURU DISTRICT
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.VINAYAKUMAR N.D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.RAVISHANKARM ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY IV ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILYU COURT IN BENGALURU IN C.MISC.3/2012 ON I.A.3 DATED 6.1.2017 VIDE ANNEX-F.GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE OPERATIONS OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER VIDE ANNEX-E.POST THIS W.P. FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING BEFORE SINGLE JUDGE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Both the counsels appearing for the petitioner as well as respondent submits that writ petition is filed questioning the interim maintenance order passed by the court below and pending this writ petition the court below
had already passed final orders in the main petition itself.
NC: 2024:KHC:15679 WP No. 8629 of 2017
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39
SRI A.R.KUMUTA RAMAIAH
SMT.RENUKA
SRI.RAHUL
KUMARI RASHMI
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
