The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution, noting the petitioner's failure to appear despite a three-year pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:44213 WP No. 8481 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8481 OF 2021 (GM-KEB)
BETWEEN:
MR. LAYEEQUAR RAHMAN KHAN S/O MR PACHA ABDUS SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.988, 13TH CROSS, 1ST STAGE, 3RD BLOCK, HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE NORTH, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 043.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.AVIN TIPPANNA HANAMAPPA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGALURU-560 045.
NC: 2024:KHC:44213 WP No. 8481 of 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
Sri.Shanthi Bhushan., counsel for respondents 3 and 4
has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of November 2024. The petition is pending from three years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not
NC: 2024:KHC:44213 WP No. 8481 of 2021
interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition
is dismissed for non-prosecution .
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 65
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR. LAYEEQUAR RAHMAN KHAN
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, H.B.R.LAYOUT
BANGALORE ELECTRIC SARABARAJU NIGAMA LIMITED
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL)
JYOTI MULIMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
