The court disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying to quash a sale notice and an order. The court held that the writ petition became infructuous as the sale date had passed.
The writ petition stands disposed as having become infructuous since the date of sale has passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:6753 WP No. 843 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 843 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SIDDESH RENUKA S/O LATE B.R.RENUKA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO. 127, NEW NO. 42 2ND MAIN ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BENGALURU – 560 018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. ARCHANA MURTHY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE BHAVASARA KSHATRIYA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED HEAD OFFICE, “SAHAKARA SADANA” NO. 63/67, 24TH CROSS, KILARI ROAD BENGALURU – 560 053 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. LOKESH K. V., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO 1) QUASH THE SALE NOTICE BEARING REF. NO. BKCB.ADMIN.574/2023-24 DATED 08/12/2023, VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND B1.
NC: 2024:KHC:6753 WP No. 843 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following
prayer:
Sri K.V.Lokesh submits that the sale of the property on the slated date has not been taken place and the petition in the form that is existing, is rendered infructuous.
the outstanding amount is paid pursuant to the order of this Court on 09.01.2024.
NC: 2024:KHC:6753 WP No. 843 of 2024
sale has spent itself, no further indulgence be shown qua the prayer that is sought in the case at hand. The deposit made
by the petitioner pursuant to the order of this Court, shall be taken has deposit by the respondent – bank, for the ensuing sale that would be notified and the petitioner is at liberty to knock at the doors of the appropriate For a, if need arises.
disposed as having become infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
NVJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 77 CT:SS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. SIDDESH RENUKA
THE BHAVASARA KSHATRIYA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
M. NAGAPRASANNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
