Sri Venugopal P v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a BDA demand of Rs.20,64,444/- relating to allotment of margin land was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition challenging a BDA demand of Rs.20,64,444/- relating to allotment of margin land was withdrawn by the petitioner and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:49312 WP NO.7915 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7915 OF 2020 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
SRI. VENUGOPAL P. S/O SHRI. PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO.40/A, KHATA NO.250, GIRIYAPA GARDENS ROAD, TARABANAHALLI, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, CHIKKABANAVARA POST, BENGALURU - 560 090.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESHA P. AND NARENDRA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2024:KHC:49312 WP NO.7915 OF 2020
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19TH JULY, 2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A, ORDERING FOR THE PAYMENT OF RS.20,64,444/- (RUPEES TWENTY LAKHS SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY FOUR ONLY) WITHIN A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF THE SAID LETTER IN RELATION TO THE ALLOTMENT OF MARGIN LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 20.16 SQUARE METERS; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed memo dated 02nd December, 2024, seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, as the petitioner does not want to pursue the matter. Memo is taken on record and accepted.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Venugopal P.
The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority
Deputy Secretary No.3, Administration Division, Bangalore Development Authority
E.S. INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court